libdvdcss merger

[Matthias Saou]

Hans de Goede wrote :

> Richi Plana wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as both 
> >> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel 
> >> package which should be removed.
> > 
> > Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate
> > package? And is this an rpmfusion policy?
> 
> No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a 
> rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora 
> policies.

And libdvdcss is dlopen()ed from everywhere anyway, right?

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.1-10.fc7
Load : 0.08 0.06 0.11