Adobe reader
Lubomir Kundrak
lkundrak at redhat.com
Tue Oct 30 11:40:52 CET 2007
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:11 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Friday, 26 October 2007 at 07:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 25.10.2007 19:57, RPM Fusion Wiki wrote:
> >>> The following page has been changed by ChristophKarl:
> >>> http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist?action=diff&rev1=12&rev2=13
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Place your current requests here.
> >>> {{{
> >>> + Request: Acrobat Reader
> >>> + Summary: Viewing PDF Files.
> >>> + URL: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2_allversions.html
> >>> + Grounds for inclusion: For complicated documents Acrobat Reader produces better results
> >>> +
> >> As much as I would like a sane Adobe reader RPM in rpmfusion, it's not
> >> possible afaics. From
> >> http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/distribute.html
> >> """
> >> Note: Third-party websites must link directly to Adobe.com for the
> >> download of Adobe Reader software. Hosting the software independently is
> >> not permitted.
> >> """
> >>
> >> IOW: we can ship that without breaking licenses, thus we won't ship it.
> >> Same for flash-player afaik.
> >
> > We could provide nosrc.rpms like jpackage does, but we can think about it
> > later.
> >
> > Regards,
> > R.
> >
>
> Actually I have a group of students working on a third party application
> installer for Fedora, which will use a combination of autodownloader, no src
> rpms (which will automatically get build using "sources" downloaded through
> autodownloader) and system-install-packages, the end result will be a list of
> applications like acroreader, googleearth, realplayer, etc. Which can then be
> installed / updated with a single click by the enduser, while still getting
> correct SELinux permissions, being easy removable as they will be installed as
> rpms, etc.
Are you creating a separate application, or integrating with existing
ones?
Tried asking Panu if it would be a bad thing to make rpmbuild download
files Sources tags if they are not available? Creating a yum plugin
shouldn't be hard also.
--
Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team)
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list