owners.list not entirely right

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Tue Oct 14 18:29:01 CEST 2008


On 14.10.2008 11:57, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
>> not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
>> comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should
>> be added to initialcc, and in the case where Chris is the primary
>> maintainer (sdlmess), I should be.
>> Could you please also have a look at the cvs acls (if these aren't the
>> same). A while ago Thorsten rebuilt sdlmame due to some buildsys issues,
>> and I did not get any mail regarding cvs commit.
> Co-maintainers are registered in cvs acls from CVS admin requested
> (cvs will do its job to mail maintainer and co-maintainer).
> initalcc is something else where anybody could request to be added to
> track changes in cvs.

/me wonders if that's supposed to be read as "Julian, please file a 
proper cvs change request in bugzilla"

> I'll have a look on sdlmame

No need to afaics -- I just queued the build with the old tag (and hence 
did not commit anything to cvs), as the older build had never left the 
buildsys.

Cu
knurd


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list