owners.list not entirely right

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Tue Oct 14 18:29:01 CEST 2008

On 14.10.2008 11:57, Xavier Lamien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
>> not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
>> comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should
>> be added to initialcc, and in the case where Chris is the primary
>> maintainer (sdlmess), I should be.
>> Could you please also have a look at the cvs acls (if these aren't the
>> same). A while ago Thorsten rebuilt sdlmame due to some buildsys issues,
>> and I did not get any mail regarding cvs commit.
> Co-maintainers are registered in cvs acls from CVS admin requested
> (cvs will do its job to mail maintainer and co-maintainer).
> initalcc is something else where anybody could request to be added to
> track changes in cvs.

/me wonders if that's supposed to be read as "Julian, please file a 
proper cvs change request in bugzilla"

> I'll have a look on sdlmame

No need to afaics -- I just queued the build with the old tag (and hence 
did not commit anything to cvs), as the older build had never left the 


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list