How to test RPM Fusion

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 30.09.2008 01:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As 
>> such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in 
>> Blogs, Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a 
>> official testing phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important bits 
>> in place. tia! 
> Is it useful to do a new compose of the live cd by replacing Livna 
> development with RPMFusion development repository? 

Please note that the compx.xml file is still in a flux and might 
complicate things a bit for you (e.g. you might need to adjust things 
again later); details in this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02615.html

Not to mention that a whole lot of packages are not in any groups right 
now. But all of that likely is not a big problem.

> I got precious little 
> feedback but a lot of downloads on the last compose so I would like to 
> hear more opinions.

Sorry, but I mostly ignored the whole spins discussions up to now :-/ I 
consider getting rpmfusion running way more important for now, that's 
why I focus on that right now; and the long discussion around a 
rpmfusion spin happened when I was on vacation. :-(


Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but

- where does the name omeaga come from?

- will omega become the official RPM Fusion spin or just serve as base 
for one?

- seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based on 
livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them together 
at one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts?

Please don't take those questions as offense -- I like the idea with the 
spin. I just want to understand the long term goals and plans better.

CU
knurd