Formal reviews and sponsoring

[Andrea Musuruane]

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Steven Moix <steven.moix at axianet.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just made an (in)formal review of
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406 corresponding to all
> the points in the Fedora guidelines. I'm currently sponsored as a Fedora
> contributor but don't have any package in rpmfusion yet (bug 414 is
> waiting for a formal review).
>
> So, am I allowed to take ownership of this review or should I be
> sponsored in rpmfudion first?

Yes, you are. You can assign the review to you.

> The wiki is unclear on this point and
> states 2 things:
> 1: "As time permits, a reviewer will review your package. A reviewer is
> either a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion only sponsored
> packager."

This is correct. You are a Fedora sponsored packager therefore you can
review packages.

> 2: "A review request should only be accepted by a maintainer that has at
> least one package in the RPM Fusion repository and for newcomers only by
> a sponsor."

I'll correct this in the wiki. Thanks for spotting it.

Bye,

Andrea.