[Bug 445] New: Review request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Mar 17 17:56:17 CET 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445

           Summary: Review request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular
                    year a leap year?
           Product: Package Reviews
           Version: Current
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Review Request
        AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
        ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org
                CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
            Blocks: 2
   Estimated Hours: 0.0


Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Date-Leapyear.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Date-Leapyear-1.71-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description: 
Date::Leapyear exports one function - isleap - which returns 1 or 0 if a
year is leap, or not, respectively.

License is Artistic 1.0, which is non-free according to Fedora.

rpmlint :
perl-Date-Leapyear.src: W: invalid-license Artistic
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--> The reason why it's not in Fedora.

This is my first package for RPM Fusion, but I'm already sponsored in Fedora.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list