[Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527





--- Comment #89 from Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar at gmail.com>  2009-05-21 22:53:03 ---
(In reply to comment #88)
> Thanks Dan and Zarko. I think this is the best we can do for the time being.

Thanks to you, too. :)

> 
> Zarko, it is a good practice to add a comment for each patch and additional
> source file (if there's any), indicating what it is for and giving a link to
> the upstream bugtracker and/or to the respective commit from the trunk. Could
> you add these comments?

Yes I can, but I explained these patches in Changelog section of spec file:
====================================================
%changelog
* Wed May 20 2009 Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar at gmail.com> - 0.4.0-3
- added linker patch to fix link motionest against libm
- added license patch to fix license info of MLT++ 
- set license of MLT devel subpackage to LGPLv2+ 
====================================================

> 
> I am removing your sponsorship request (bug #30) since you are already
> sponsored in Fedora.

O, thanks....
> 
> 
> Please reason your objection if you have any.
> 

? What with PPC?? 
  Can we build this package on PPC architecture or not, after last spec
intervention?
 Or I must put
 ExcludeArch: PPC, PPC64 

? What with segfaults under F10?
  Will we build only for F11, or...


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.