[Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video
editors, media players, transcoders
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Thu May 21 23:14:54 CEST 2009
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #90 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-05-21 23:14:54 ---
(In reply to comment #89)
> (In reply to comment #88)
> >
> > Zarko, it is a good practice to add a comment for each patch and additional
> > source file (if there's any), indicating what it is for and giving a link
> > to the upstream bugtracker and/or to the respective commit from the trunk.
> > Could you add these comments?
>
> Yes I can, but I explained these patches in Changelog section of spec file:
I meant, commenting about the patches/additional sources where you actually
declare them
See for instance:
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/traverso/devel/traverso.spec?root=free&view=markup
>
> ? What with PPC??
> Can we build this package on PPC architecture or not, after last spec
> intervention?
> Or I must put
> ExcludeArch: PPC, PPC64
>
No, please don't exclude them. Let us see how things go when you do the builds.
> ? What with segfaults under F10?
> Will we build only for F11, or...
>
I would request cvs for all of them but do not build on dists < F-11 until the
segfault issue is resolved.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list