[Bug 985] Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Aug 1 15:12:42 CEST 2010
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
--- Comment #12 from Göran Uddeborg <goeran at uddeborg.se> 2010-08-01 15:12:41 ---
> Every time you make a published change to the spec, you need to bump the
> release number
Well I did bump from -3 to -3.20091201cvs. That's later to rpm/yum. Maybe it
would have been more obvious if I had bumped the "3" to "4" too, though. I'll
do so in the future.
> The changelog info was not updated
Um, yes, that was sloppy. I don't have the -3 version around any more, but
I've tried to retrofit now.
> It's non-standard to double-space sentences
I once was taught to do it, and have kept the habit. But I know it's debated,
and I can switch to single-spacing if you prefer.
> Should at least include a correct upstream path
I didn't put any since there isn't any upstream path to the tar archive. But
I've added a comment on how the tar archive can be (re)made using a cvs and a
tar command. It includes the exact path to the CVS pserver. Is this a good
way to document where it comes from?
> It can ease reading of the spec to separate the main sections with two-new
> lines. At least this should be consistent through the spec.
So you like double spacing in SOME cases. :-)
There wasn't double line spacing anywhere, so in that sense it was consistent.
But I've added extra lines in some places. (I guess it could be debated what
constitutes a "main section". If you think more or less is needed, let me
know.)
> %buildroot%_datadir : while Hans mentioned the reasoning behind using %{_x},
> it would seem to make the spec clearer by using them eg in:
> %buildroot%{_datadir}
Hans?
In comment 9 the only real rule was to be consistent, and your suggestion would
be contrary to that.
In the end, what is clear is of course a matter of taste. To me, unneeded
braces clutters the spec and makes it LESS clear. If you really insist I could
change it, but I WOULD like to keep it the way it is.
Updated version available at
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-4.20100801cvs.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list