[Bug 985] Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Aug 1 15:12:42 CEST 2010


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985





--- Comment #12 from Göran Uddeborg <goeran at uddeborg.se>  2010-08-01 15:12:41 ---
> Every time you make a published change to the spec, you need to bump the 
> release number

Well I did bump from -3 to -3.20091201cvs.  That's later to rpm/yum.  Maybe it
would have been more obvious if I had bumped the "3" to "4" too, though.  I'll
do so in the future.

> The changelog info was not updated

Um, yes, that was sloppy.  I don't have the -3 version around any more, but
I've tried to retrofit now.

> It's non-standard to double-space sentences

I once was taught to do it, and have kept the habit.  But I know it's debated,
and I can switch to single-spacing if you prefer.

> Should at least include a correct upstream path

I didn't put any since there isn't any upstream path to the tar archive.  But
I've added a comment on how the tar archive can be (re)made using a cvs and a
tar command.  It includes the exact path to the CVS pserver.  Is this a good
way to document where it comes from?

> It can ease reading of the spec to separate the main sections with two-new
> lines. At least this should be consistent through the spec.

So you like double spacing in SOME cases. :-)

There wasn't double line spacing anywhere, so in that sense it was consistent. 
But I've added extra lines in some places.  (I guess it could be debated what
constitutes a "main section".  If you think more or less is needed, let me
know.)


> %buildroot%_datadir : while Hans mentioned the reasoning behind using %{_x},
> it would seem to make the spec clearer by using them eg in:
> %buildroot%{_datadir}

Hans?

In comment 9 the only real rule was to be consistent, and your suggestion would
be contrary to that.

In the end, what is clear is of course a matter of taste.  To me, unneeded
braces clutters the spec and makes it LESS clear.  If you really insist I could
change it, but I WOULD like to keep it the way it is.

Updated version available at
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-4.20100801cvs.fc14.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list