What to do about Infrastructure?

solarflow99 solarflow99 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 23 06:56:18 CEST 2010


On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/8/23 Jarod Wilson <jarod at wilsonet.com>:
>>
>> I've tried to get more involved a few times, and its never really
>> managed to go anywhere. I'd like to do more than just provide a build
>> host, and occasionally hop on and fix (or break) things on it, but the
>> reality is that I probably don't have the time to do much more than
>> that.
>>
>> That said, I'm just about ready to replace the vm I currently provide
>> as a builder with real hardware. I've got a glut of atom 330 boxes
>> right now, so I was about to roll out a dual-core atom 330 box with
>> 4GB of RAM and 1.5TB of storage (2x 250G internal + 1TB e-sata) as a
>> replacement for the vm. It should be capable of providing additional
>> services, if desired. (I've got other slightly more powerful hardware
>> that could be rolled out as well, but went with this system for power
>> consumption considerations).
>>
>> --
>> Jarod Wilson
>> jarod at wilsonet.com
>>
>
> Thanks for your effort, will we have a change to implement koji and
> pkdb from Fedora? A similar infrastructure with fedora can help more
> fedora contributors involved in rpmfusion. I also suggest to split
> kernel modules into a separate repo, they are definitely different
> with other packages.

I'd be glad to help with changes to the documentation and whatever can
be done to make the whole process as simple as possible to help new
package developers.  The instructions seem pretty good right now.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list