retiring sdlmame-data-foo packages

[Chen Lei]

2010/9/30 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>:
> Dear all,
>
> recently a request was filed to rename this packages to mame-data-foo
> [1], which has prompted me to ask myself the question: do these packages
> make any sense?
> In my opinion, they violate two of the packaging guidelines: code vs
> content and shipping multiple upstreams in one package. I think that
> sdlmame-data itself makes some sense since it enriches the experience
> with frontends, but others are pointless imo. Having said that, I just
> issued what I think will be a final update to sdlmame-data samples.
> Also, co-maintainers for the main sdlmame-data package are welcome.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426
>
>
Maybe you can also retire sdlmess-data* packages as well :)

Chen Lei