retiring sdlmame-data-foo packages

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 30.09.2010 05:12, Chen Lei pisze:
> 2010/9/30 Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com>:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> recently a request was filed to rename this packages to mame-data-foo
>> [1], which has prompted me to ask myself the question: do these packages
>> make any sense?
>> In my opinion, they violate two of the packaging guidelines: code vs
>> content and shipping multiple upstreams in one package. I think that
>> sdlmame-data itself makes some sense since it enriches the experience
>> with frontends, but others are pointless imo. Having said that, I just
>> issued what I think will be a final update to sdlmame-data samples.
>> Also, co-maintainers for the main sdlmame-data package are welcome.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426
>>
>>
> Maybe you can also retire sdlmess-data* packages as well :)
> 
> Chen Lei
> 
This is a little different, since mess-data packages files which are
actually shipped in the mess zip.

Julian