OpenAFS and Static Libraries
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Fri Mar 4 17:08:28 CET 2011
On 03/04/2011 04:57 PM, Jack Neely wrote:
> Secondly, many more experienced AFS administrators prefer the old
> Transarc style paths over the FHS paths that my packages use. I would
> like to create an openafs-transarc sub-package that includes the
> symlinks that would enable these non-standard paths. (Specifically,
> /usr/afs and /usr/vice.)
No way, never.
> The first issue with the static libs really needs to happen. The second
> issue is just pure annoyance but will make these packages more usable to
> certain folks. I'd like to do both. Are there any comments or reason
> why I should not?
Because this "transarc style" doesn't comply to the FHS.
Ralf
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list