OpenAFS and Static Libraries

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Fri Mar 4 17:08:28 CET 2011


On 03/04/2011 04:57 PM, Jack Neely wrote:

> Secondly, many more experienced AFS administrators prefer the old
> Transarc style paths over the FHS paths that my packages use.  I would
> like to create an openafs-transarc sub-package that includes the
> symlinks that would enable these non-standard paths.  (Specifically,
> /usr/afs and /usr/vice.)

No way, never.

> The first issue with the static libs really needs to happen.  The second
> issue is just pure annoyance but will make these packages more usable to
> certain folks.  I'd like to do both.  Are there any comments or reason
> why I should not?

Because this "transarc style" doesn't comply to the FHS.

Ralf



More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list