Greetings Mplayer Maintainers!

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 02:53 -0800, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> 
> On 02/24/2012 02:26 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2012/2/24 Joseph D. Wagner<joe at josephdwagner.info>:
> >>
> >> On 02/24/2012 01:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >>> 2012/2/24 Sérgio Basto<sergio at serjux.com>:
> >>>> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 00:21 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> from this thread we have 4 candidates to maintain mplayer:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Julian Sikorski  which maintain the gnome-mplayer.
> >>>>> I (Sérgio Basto) which co-maintain smplayer.
> >>>>> Richard Shaw , which helps if it is need it (and have more admin
> >>>>> permissions, though).
> >>>>> Joseph D. Wagner which wish a mplayer updated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A little note: I though that was updated, for me mplayer with 18 months
> >>>>> is updated :) I saw for the first time real HD (mkv) in my laptop with
> >>>>> current mplayer on rpmfusion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> we got ffmpeg-0_10
> >>>>> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12011
> >>>>> and src.rpm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/12011-ffmpeg-0.10-1.fc18/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> who begging packaging ? or how we organize ourselves?
> >>>>> I will pick ffmeg 0.10 compile for F16 and try update mplayer on F16
> >>>>> too .
> >>>> http://www.serjux.com/mplayer/
> >>>> on this link is my work .
> >>>>
> >>>> To compile ffmpeg , I have to update x264 or ./configure of ffmpeg
> >>>> complains about x264<    0.118
> >>>> After that ffmpeg compiles without problems.
> >>> Can you please pick a known version of x264 from RPM Fusion devel, branch.
> >>> Maintaining x264 is another issue.
> >>> I had a problem with more recent snapshot, specially as the patch
> >>> didn't applied and need to be reworked.
> >>> If you have done some work in this area, please forward it to the x264
> >>> maintainer or apply to the co-maintainership.
> >>>
> >>> Thx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nicolas (kwizart)
> >>>
> >> I got this to work.
> > Can you please prevent yourself to send me such gooddam piece of crap!
> > Please never reproduce that or your will be on my crap list!
> > *
> > *
> >
> 
> With such gracious manners, I have to wonder why more people don't 
> become package maintainers.

LOL, sorry your sentence was funny :)

> I've fully admitted that I'm new at this, and I am trying to learn.  I 
> would appreciate an environment more conducive to learning 

Please don't send binaries to the list, just send one link to it. Some
people may use pine from 90's and will see crap :). Which means that you
must have one place for yours external link, dropbox will be fine or
anything else.

ah! and if is not absolutely important send just to ML (mailing list),
specially if is a person who have to read the ML.
For me, you can always cc me, I prefer get email also by cc, but is not
common .

Well but the point of writing to you, is to say that yours
x264-nover.patch is better than mine, good work!. 
you are welcome in chat of rpmfusion Sunday ...  

about maintainers of x264 : Fedora|x264|H264/AVC video streams encoder|
rpm at greysector.net||kwizart at gmail.com 

http://rpm.greysector.net/
seams away , I remember mplayer from greysector.net 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.