Greetings Mplayer Maintainers!

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 19:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:41 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote: 
> > On Friday, 24 February 2012 at 17:32, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > as a quick answer
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 10:00 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > > Can you please pick a known version of x264 from RPM Fusion devel,
> > > > branch.
> > > 
> > > well ./configure of ffmpeg requires x264 >= 0.118 which x264 from RPM
> > > Fusion devel doesn't met that require.
> > > 
> > > > Maintaining x264 is another issue.
> > > > I had a problem with more recent snapshot, specially as the patch
> > > > didn't applied and need to be reworked.
> > > 
> > > I had rework the patch . http://www.serjux.com/mplayer/x264-nover.patch
> > 
> > That patch is probably wrong. I'll take a look at how to do it better
> > and get back to you.
> 
> It was a quick fix, Joe do this which is better   
> http://www.serjux.com/mplayer/x264-nover.joe.patch
> 
> Anyway I don't know if you have time but I my opinion rpm version should
> be 0.120 and not 0.0.0-0.34 . 
> 
> "cat  /usr/include/x264_config.h 
> (...)
> #define X264_POINTVER "0.120.2151 a3f4407"
> 
> I see that x264 is version 0.120 ! "

Fedora guidelines say we should use 0 for version if upstream doesn't
do releases. We moved to 0.0.0 when RPMFusion was created to provide
an upgrade path from Freshrpms. I have no objections to using what you
suggest if you think it'll make life easier for anyone.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"