MOC's packages review requests

[Antonio Trande]

2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com>

> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
>
> The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
> ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
> longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
> one.
>
> Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
> submitter is still interested.
>
> The review seems stalled to me.
> > About libRCC/libRCD ?
>
> You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea.
>


Ah, ok. The last comment
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is of
May 2010.
At the comment 17
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri Timofeev
says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
packages) .

Actually is someone still interested to it ?

-- 
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"

**mail*: mailto:sagitter at fedoraproject.org <sagitter at fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20121006/0d9a413a/attachment.html>