MOC's packages review requests

[Antonio Trande]

2012/10/6 Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com>

> 2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com>
>
>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
>>
>> The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
>> ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
>> longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
>> one.
>>
>> Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
>> submitter is still interested.
>>
>> The review seems stalled to me.
>> > About libRCC/libRCD ?
>>
>> You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrea.
>>
>
>
> Ah, ok. The last comment
> <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is
> of May 2010.
> At the comment 17 <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri Timofeev says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
> include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
> packages) .
>
> Actually is someone still interested to it ?



Raymond Lu doesn't reply me by mail (I sent a mail to rayllu at yahoo.com).
Please let me know what you want to do regarding
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 or else I give up for
now.

Regards.

-- 
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"

**mail*: mailto:sagitter at fedoraproject.org <sagitter at fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20121008/b32e131f/attachment.html>