[Bug 3152] Review request: dropbox-repo - 3rd-party repo package for Dropbox client
RPM Fusion Bugzilla
noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Jan 27 22:32:57 CET 2014
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Comment #28 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> 2014-01-27 22:32:57 CET ---
Reading that GL again, I *think* this might boil down to how rpmfusion handles
the fact that this is about non-free software. In other words, if this was
about free software it might be OK as long as it's a "specific piece of sw".
Which this is.
However, in the Fedora case this should be approved by Fesco and Fedora legal.
These cannot approve anything for rpmfusion, though. What does this mean for
rpmfusion?
Part of this discussion is that rpmfusion actually have a list of "endorsed"
3-rd party repos. If we say to users they can add these manually, what's the
difference providing some tooling, still with users doing all decisions?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list