ffmpeg-2.4 released

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:56, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> 
> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>> W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>>> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>>>> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>>>>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild
>>>>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is
>>>>>> not bad given the extent of API changes:
>>>>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' has
>>>>>> no member named 'frame'
>>>>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was not declared
>>>>>> in this scope
>>>>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: 'av_find_stream_info' was
>>>>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt first)
>>>>>>  - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and later are not
>>>>>> supported yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be the good time to
>>>>>> do the rebuild?
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of others
>>>>> packages, no problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like put it at
>>>>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the packages, with
>>>>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on update-testing for more
>>>>> time than usual, but is not my decision .  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards, 
>>>>>
>>>> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of rebuilding mplayer.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Julian
>>>
>>> Hi, please wait, let's wait to know if kwizart allow us to put ffmpeg
>>> 2.3.3 in F20, we think it is better and we have strong reasons , like
>>> explained in
>>> https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2014-September/017393.html
>>>
>>> Kwizart , do you allow this exception ? 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, 
>>>
>> Just to be clear: I only pushed it to devel. F20 is still an open question.
> 
> yes , but I want copy from devel to F20, the state of art , before
> upgrading to ffmpeg 2.4 , will be  more easier , clean etc , and  just
> after this update (on F20), update devel to ffmpeg 2.4 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
Hi,

it seems like we had a bit of misunderstanding. I was under the
impression we are good to go with 2.4 in rawhide, and 2.2/2.3 for F20 is
what we were discussing.
I don't think it makes sense to roll back now, let's just rebuild the
dependencies to minimise breakage time.
I think I should apply for the ffmpeg deps commit access moving forward,
so that there are more people who can do the rebuild.

Best regards,
Julian