Bug triage for f23

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Fri Dec 4 02:21:57 CET 2015


On Sáb, 2015-11-21 at 13:40 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > The problem with pipelight is that it depends on
> > pipelight-selinux which was imported into Fedora,
> > but then later dropped as the rest of pipelight
> > ended up in rpmfusion. We should add a new
> > pipelight-selinux package to rpmfusion-nonfree
> > and import the latest src.rpm from:
> > 
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=545078
> > 
> > To fix this, feel free to make me the maintainer
> > of pipelight-selinux (I'm a pipelight user).
>
> I don't get in which direction the wind blows currently WRT selinux
> policy packaging, but can't we have the pipelight-selinux merged back
> into pipelight package ? (keeping the -selinux package might be
> optional since obviously we are using selinux by default and even
> this package requires -selinux by default).

pipelight-selinux is retired since F21 [1]
can't we temporary remove Requires: %{name}-selinux [2] 

anyway pipelight needs updates 

I opened a bug report [3] 

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pipelight-selinux/
[2] https://github.com/rpmfusion/pipelight/blob/master/pipelight.spec#L
54
[3] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3890


Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list