rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-10-15 at 07:29 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Seg, 2015-10-12 at 08:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23:
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > > 
> > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the
> > > plans here ?
> > 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user
> > glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied  : 
> > "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week
> > so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates.
> > Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too
> > little on new infra tasks"
> > I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again.
> > And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo
> > is published in directory development/23/ !
> > 
> > I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will
> > be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest
> > priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? 
> > 
> > About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers
> > like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next
> > piece that we should integrated ? 
> 
> I don't think packages should have the priority. At least not until it receives
> the work that we are planning on doing on it and while useful for user it does
> not have an influence on the other tools (bothi2, pkgdb2).

After thinking, pkgdb2 seems to be the most important, because we can
give acls to commit permissions ... 

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.