rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

Julian Sikorski belegdol at gmail.com
Sun Oct 25 21:12:15 CET 2015


W dniu 23.10.2015 o 13:57, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> Hello mates 
> 
> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>:
>>         Hi All,
>>         
>>         I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
>>         for Fedora-23:
>>         
>>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>>         https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>>         
>>         But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
>>         are the
>>         plans here ?
>> Sorry for the lake for answear,
>>
>>
>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
>>
>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
>>
>>
>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
>>
> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
> like try do it in oneshot ... 
> 
> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> yesterday for F23 .
> 
> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . 
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists 
> 
> [2]
> https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee
>>
> 
>>
> 
I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted
already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is
not completely populated yet.

Julian


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list