rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ? (sending again)

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 08:14 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede
> > <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
> > <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>:
> > 
> >     Hi,
> > 
> > 
> >     On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> >         Hello mates
> > 
> >         On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 
> >             2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede
> >             <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
> >             <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>:
> >                      Hi All,
> > 
> >                      I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer
> >             packages to 1.6.x
> >                      for Fedora-23:
> > 
> >                      https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> >                      https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> >                      https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > 
> >                      But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23
> >             yet. What
> >                      are the
> >                      plans here ?
> >             Sorry for the lake for answear,
> > 
> > 
> >             The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some
> >             time
> >             after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> > 
> >             development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the
> >             f23 key,
> >             updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> >             (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> > 
> > 
> >             Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into
> >             releases/23
> >             later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> >             end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> > 
> >         As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> >         x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild !
> >         and I'd
> >         like try do it in oneshot ...
> > 
> >         Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> >         yesterday for F23 .
> > 
> >         I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> >         publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a
> >         copy!) ,
> >         I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some
> >         coordination
> >         to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik
> >         suggest
> >         and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname
> >         bump .
> > 
> > 
> >     Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
> >     be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
> >     F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
> >     its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
> > 
> >  
> > We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
> > completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
> > version fit.
> > Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.
> > 
> > Thx
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -
> > 
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> Hi,
> 
> I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw,
> should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net?

Hello, 
Thanks for taking care of mplayer.
What are the developments ? 
- https://github.com/rpmfusion have a mirror of all sources , at least
people could know the state of updates and build in on others arches 
- if spectool -g foo.spec doesn't download the sources , we should
upload sources to old infra with old make new-sources FILES="foo" 
- and, please, do not forget update the sources file on git (md5sum
foo.tar.bz2 > sources)

BTW what is the state of gstreamer (packages to 1.6.x ) for F23 ? you
need help?

Thanks, 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.