rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
Sat Oct 31 12:18:15 CET 2015
Hi,
On 29-10-15 15:13, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 08:14 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>>> 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede
>>> <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello mates
>>>
>>> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>
>>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede
>>> <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer
>>> packages to 1.6.x
>>> for Fedora-23:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>>>
>>> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23
>>> yet. What
>>> are the
>>> plans here ?
>>> Sorry for the lake for answear,
>>>
>>>
>>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some
>>> time
>>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
>>>
>>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the
>>> f23 key,
>>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
>>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
>>>
>>>
>>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into
>>> releases/23
>>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
>>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
>>>
>>> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
>>> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild !
>>> and I'd
>>> like try do it in oneshot ...
>>>
>>> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
>>> yesterday for F23 .
>>>
>>> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
>>> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a
>>> copy!) ,
>>> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some
>>> coordination
>>> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik
>>> suggest
>>> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname
>>> bump .
>>>
>>>
>>> Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
>>> be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
>>> F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
>>> its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
>>>
>>>
>>> We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
>>> completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
>>> version fit.
>>> Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.
>>>
>>> Thx
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -
>>>
>>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw,
>> should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net?
>
> Hello,
> Thanks for taking care of mplayer.
> What are the developments ?
> - https://github.com/rpmfusion have a mirror of all sources , at least
> people could know the state of updates and build in on others arches
> - if spectool -g foo.spec doesn't download the sources , we should
> upload sources to old infra with old make new-sources FILES="foo"
> - and, please, do not forget update the sources file on git (md5sum
> foo.tar.bz2 > sources)
>
> BTW what is the state of gstreamer (packages to 1.6.x ) for F23 ? you
> need help?
Nope, I was waiting for the ffmpeg bits to fall in place, and then I
just needed to find some time. Nicolas' git now has updates to 1.6.1
for all 3 gstreamer1-* packages (and the lookaside-cache has the necessary
file). I'll drop Nicolas a mail asking to build these.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list