Kodi
Nicolas Chauvet
kwizart at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 00:17:25 CEST 2016
2016-06-22 23:57 GMT+02:00 Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com>:
> On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to backport kodi 17
>> to stable (f24) at some point.
>> There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or
>> whatever. But having the repo and upgrade path broken for 23-->24 user
>> migration is more a problem. This is a rel-eng concern.
>
>
> It should be the package maintainers discretion as to if a version is stable
> enough or not - not by only reading the words "alpha" or "beta" and saying
> "No, we cannot have this version in our repos." I have found that Kodi
> alpha/beta releases are stable enough to be consumed by everyone, but I will
> only issue an update after I have tested it myself.
So we agree!
Now do you really beleive I should untag koji-16 from koji for
f24-free and build kodi-17 instead ?
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
More information about the rpmfusion-developers
mailing list