Kodi

Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com
Wed Jun 22 23:57:48 CEST 2016


On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to  backport kodi 17
> to stable (f24) at some point.
> There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or
> whatever. But having the repo and upgrade path broken for 23-->24 user
> migration is more a problem. This is a rel-eng concern.

It should be the package maintainers discretion as to if a version is stable enough 
or not - not by only reading the words "alpha" or "beta" and saying "No, we cannot 
have this version in our repos." I have found that Kodi alpha/beta releases are 
stable enough to be consumed by everyone, but I will only issue an update after I 
have tested it myself.

> Sure , but where would I know this info ? The patch that was made
> available to you on github has fixed the build.

You need to e-mail me. If you would have asked me if you could build Kodi I would 
have engaged in a discussion with you on how to proceed.

>
> That is not my indend.

Unfortunately the way you present yourself does not show your intent in another way. 
Thank you for hosting RPMFusion, but please be careful in how you phrase things and 
act on things.

Thanks,
Michael


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list