FAS fully migrated to new version and URL

Nicolas Chauvet kwizart at gmail.com
Sat Nov 5 00:04:47 CET 2016


2016-11-04 21:29 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com>:
> On Sex, 2016-11-04 at 08:02 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2016-11-04 4:38 GMT+01:00 Stuart Gathman <stuart at gathman.org>:
>> >
>> > On 11/02/2016 06:27 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> >
>> > With the migration from older URL to admin.rpmfusion.org/accounts
>> > we
>> > had an issue with new users accounts.
>> >
>> > This is now fixed and old URL is disabled, there is still a need to
>> > build rpmfusion-packager for the new fas. So I hope someelse to
>> > pick
>> > the tasks so I can continue with my long list.
>> >
>> > I was able to create an account.  Thanks!
>> >
>> > Now, I can't create a package request.  The server never responds
>> > to the
>> > post, and a proxy of some kind eventually times out:
>> >
>> > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/request/package/
>> Thx for reporting.
>>
>> So I've restarted the service, there were still probably some
>> leftover
>> from the fas->admin switch.
>
> Not fixed , I think we still have the same problem.
But,  I don't know what we are talking about ?!
Having "new package" in our pkgdb never worked, so it's not a
regression, we just use another way to import package.
One have to look at the pkgdb code and adapt, specially how to detect
that a particular package was approved.

What is supposed to work in pkgdb is package acl request, so this
previously needs an admin to make the changes, it's not needed
anymore, and a maintainer that is not an admin can allow another
co-maintainer, etc.
That's the current improvement.


-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list