[Bug 4286] Review request: chromium-pepper-flash - Chromium Flash player plugin

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4286

--- Comment #8 from Karel Volný <kvolny at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #4)
> Please install PepperFlash into one of these locations:
> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.
> cpp#n170
> and Widevine (which I think should really be a separate SRPM) into one of
> these locations:
> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/src/core/content_client_qt.
> cpp#n229
> 
> Otherwise, QtWebEngine will not find it.

not the best place to discuss this, but ... do I read the code correctly that
it does not include reading the path from configfile?

hardcoding the paths to .cpp seems to me the worst possible practice ... WTH
there is no make option for that at least, so distro-specific stuff can be
defined at compile time?

then we could have something like

/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so ->
/usr/lib64/all-browser-plugins/libpepflashplayer.so
/usr/lib64/chromium/libwidevinecdmadapter.so ->
/usr/lib64/all-browser-plugins/libwidevinecdmadapter.so

which would make also packaging the plugins kinda easier, right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20161007/d60d7779/attachment.html>