In Like Flynn - ? Out Like Flynn ?

[Bob Lightfoot]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/15/2014 06:00 AM, rpmfusion-users-request at lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
> Send rpmfusion-users mailing list submissions to 
> rpmfusion-users at lists.rpmfusion.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-users or, via
> email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
> rpmfusion-users-request at lists.rpmfusion.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at 
> rpmfusion-users-owner at lists.rpmfusion.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of rpmfusion-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
> 1. My exit from the house that belongs to RPMfusion. Likely will be
> censored by RPMf. (Kelsie Flynn)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Message: 1 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:35:53 -0700 From: Kelsie
> Flynn <kelsiegflynn at gmail.com> To:
> rpmfusion-users at lists.rpmfusion.org Subject: My exit from the house
> that belongs to RPMfusion. Likely will be	censored by RPMf. 
> Message-ID: 
> <CAAk+JN_bXzzx7T8tKrWK609MqfDzr21NthLWSXaCtsMk6rkRjQ at mail.gmail.com>
>
> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Over the past year I've been working with both external major build
> RPM systems to build RPMS for the projects I've been working on.
> 
> If posts appears incomplete, it was probably edited by the upstream
> admin.
> 
> Previously, I've had some (naive) idea's of bridging the two repo's
> to some extent. However, that idea was soley mine and did not
> receive support from where it needed to be. I also recently had
> ambitions to move off of el6 completely and jump on the bandwagon
> to see if it was a smooth ride. That was also overly idealistic and
> naive of me to think.
> 
> Given this. I now no longer ride this fence and try to please both
> parties. I now will focus on ATrpms compatible packages only.
> 
> If posts appears incomplete, it was probably edited by the upstream
> admin.
> 
> What does this mean technically?
> 
> It means I will not be using any Source RPMS they have been built
> at RPMfusion. I will still build missing packages that are not in
> ATrpms from EPEL or upstream.
> 
> It means the ffmpeg and other similar "moving target" packages that
> Axel and the international community chooses will be matched to all
> projects ELmythOS project uses.
> 
> It means RedHat EL6 based systems will still be supported to run
> additional Qt 4.7/4.8 along side the builtin qt-4.6.2 in el6
> proper.
> 
> It means I don't have to "reshape a wheel" too often and the result
> could be a more robust system.
> 
> If your more conservative than the most and prefer to use older
> versions for stability over NEW functionality, look no further. Use
> el6 and mythtv-0.25.x.
> 
> If you want to play in the devel sandbox with the latest toys and
> look really cool doing so, you should be on the latest releases of
> everything. Regarding that, el7 is where the NEW fuctionality will
> be so if you want to play in the mythtv, qt sandbox, use el7 and
> repos.
> 
> If posts appears incomplete, it was probably edited by the upstream
> admin.
> 
> ***Everyone understands devs want everyone to use their latest
> work, that they can be proud of. So I do not attempt to insult
> their innovation, but instead will offer alternatives of their
> older work, that I deem still relevently funtional.
> 
> I make my own decisions based on my experiences: as an End User, 
> then as a Computer Technician, then as a former Technical Support
> worker, then as Linux Systems Admin and now as an aspiring Systems
> Builder, packager and developer.
> 
> If posts appears incomplete, it was probably edited by the upstream
> admin.
> 
> Note: I do not call myself an Engineer because I'm finishing my
> education still and it would an insult to repected Engineers to do
> so. I've learned everything I know with GED as my current HIGHEST
> EDUCATION. If I ever call myself an Engineer , you can bet your
> $T#$ I will back it up with a Eng.Degree in Mathematics. For now
> I'm just a passionate volunteer Gnobody systems builder with many
> opinions and high expectations.
> 
> I know enough about C/C++ Software development right to be
> objective, as my skills improve I will make patches as needed from
> upstream. This should help the project stay updated with security
> updates.
> 
> I'm not running a popularity contest. Plenty do that already and
> miss the details I'm passionate about.
> 
> If posts appears incomplete, it was probably edited by the upstream
> admin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment
> was scrubbed... URL:
> <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-users/attachments/20140814/5108753e/attachment-0001.html>
>
>  ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-users
> mailing list rpmfusion-users at lists.rpmfusion.org 
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-users
> 
> End of rpmfusion-users Digest, Vol 616, Issue 1 
> ***********************************************
> 
 Not sure what packages you maintained for RPMFusion Kelsie, but I
hope you have better luck at ATRpms than I have of late.  The last
ATRPMs Mailing list digest came out 7 days ago 8-8-14 and they have
not released thru the repos and Mythtv 0.26 or 0.27 update in several
months.  RPMFusion may be slow moving to support el7, but their fedora
work marches forward and I am still hoping that el7 support will
flourish.  Best of luck.

Bob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT7fe5AAoJEKqgpLIhfz3XV8oH/20yZ27ypjEQy3BtmwpYGn8R
cxTUVUHt9GPFCePxLr9Sr5fusYya5vQG6XzuLU/oFvbRiXf+e5fJbERuXajMuYDW
oUDH1Y+k/drAE8YkVqvAOtMuNvoFuaAFgqicERnTwF5xW94dlaoFvs+R4sqJYwmw
zCccLpaZSwR0XbBBxaBP8RckbMvT/mPNRGktuIoCNqSG5opEpjG5wAYwwzcB6Jlf
zpjrnIlQqhT6VYHkJltr6bHDaO6ZUCEd31x3C36dKymob2L76Cmdd2SapmVU+DEq
SXg2rdYiBNli1JpL43nNxF29zFNf8aD14Jc9ntgBzXsWJskAcVulr5ai1T+duEw=
=OqeJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----