Non-redistributable packages: Skype, spotify, ...

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Mon Nov 18 21:51:58 CET 2013


On Seg, 2013-11-18 at 21:36 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: 
> On 2013-11-18 20:29, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2013-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> I wrote:
> >>> And if FPC doesn't feel competent, they should say so so we can re-file
> >>> the ticket with FESCo (or they could just forward it to FESCo directly).
> >> Actually, I see FPC made a decision now, that's good.
> > And what was decision ? , I don't understand what is write in the
> > ticket .
> >
> It basically boils down to that the main lpf package is OK for fedora, 
> while lpf-* packages as lpf-skype and lpf-spotify-client should be in a 
> 'more appropriate repository' (Don't mention the war...)
> 
> I have retired lpf-spotify-client from fedora. lpf-skype and 
> lpf-spotify-client are on their way into rpmfusion in tickets 3033 and 
> 3034 in a joint venture between me and Simone Caronni.

I will join in with "Adobe flash reader", it is possible ? 

Many thanks,  
-- 
Sérgio M. B.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list