mpeg2dec re-created as libmpeg2

[KH KH]

2008/7/24 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>:
> On 24.07.2008 11:18, KH KH wrote:
>>
>> 2008/7/24 David Juran <david at juran.se>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Update package
>>>>>> - import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, let's get back to the root of this problem. Maybe the timing for
>>>>> re-creating the mpeg2dec package under a different name was
>>>>> suboptimal...
>>>>> Nicolas, how about you back out your libmpeg2 package from rpmfusion
>>>>> and
>>>>> then we just import the livna package there. Then when things settle
>>>>> down and rpmfusion is firmly in place I can cede ownership of the
>>>>> package to you to do whatever you like with it...
>>>>
>>>> Could work. But is there a reasons why we can't simply go the other way
>>>> around and import the RPM Fusion libmpeg2 to livna devel now?
>>>
>>> I'm fine with that (-:
>>> Nicolas, do you agree it's a good idea/could you do this?
>>
>> How this will make things different than just picking it from rpmfusion ?
>
> For the user there is no RPM Fusion yet.
>
>> This problem is really an easy level one.
>
> Yes -- just ship the same package (the one you imported to RPM Fusion= in
> RPM Fusion and Livna. The EVR for the package in RPM Fusions of course must
> he higher then the one in Livna and Freshrpms. Problem solved, user can test
> and report problems now; if they find some we can fix them before RPM Fusion
> gets live.
>
Please!!! Enought talking! REMOVE this package now.
How it is possible that you don't understand this is not the right way.

Please read again...You don't answear to what i've written. That's
really disappointing.

Nicolas (kwizart)

> CU
> knurd
>