replacement builder needed

[David Timms]

On 24/10/11 05:02, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm sure there are some technical hurdles but a distributed approach
> may keep us from having to come up with a dedicated builder.
>
> What does everyone think?
I wouldn't mind doing so, but I don't think the machine side is that 
hard from the sound of it. More problematic is how to provide enough 
bandwidth, and total usage. Do we have a feel for the BW / monthly data 
usage side of the equation ?