May 2020 - rpmfusion-users

by jamestaylor0213＠gmail.com

Hello, I run EL7 for my MythTV backend. MythTV is up to version 0.31, but RPMFusion for EL7 does not have that version available. RPMFusion for EL8 doesn't have MythTV at all. Are there any plans to either upgrade the version for 7 or provide a version for 8? Thanks, --James

5 months, 4 weeks

6
17
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2020-05-27

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc30 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc31 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc31 stella-6.1.2-1.fc31 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc31 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.fc31 mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc32 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc32 stella-6.1.2-1.fc32 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc32 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.fc32 kodi-18.7-1.fc32 mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc32 zsnes-1.51-28.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpeg-3.4.7-2.el7 libopenshot-0.2.5-2.el7 libopenshot-audio-0.2.0-1.el7 openshot-2.5.1-1.el7 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.el7 transcode-1.1.7-18.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.el8 Pushed to stable: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc30 Pushed to stable: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc30 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc31 Pushed to stable: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc31 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc32 Pushed to stable: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc32 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el7 Pushed to stable: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el8 Pushed to stable: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.el8 Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

1 year

2
1
0 / 0

gstreamer1-plugins-* conflicts in RHEL 8.2

by avkaplmkt＠gmail.com

(I am resending this post because for some reason my previous attempt failed, sorry for possible double-posting) Dear rpmfusion-users, I have an RHEL 8.2 system configured with the the RPMFusion EL 8 updates repository. When I try to run the `sudo dnf groupupdate Multimedia` command to install packages such as gstreamer, I get the following error: ``` Error: Problem: package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.16.1-1.el8.x86_64 conflicts with gstreamer1-plugins-ugly < 1.16.0-2 provided by gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.14.0-1.el8.1.x86_64 - cannot install the best candidate for the job (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ``` Running just the `sudo dnf update` command produces the same error. I tried `--allowerasing`, `--best`, `--nobest` arguments to dnf and combinations of them but none worked to address the issue. I can see that there is a version mismatch between the distribution's gstreamer package vs RPMFusion, but how can I fix this problem? Please advise, thank you!

1 year

3
3
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2020-05-29

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc30 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.2.2-1.fc31 mythtv-31.0-3.20200527gitfc90482281.fc31 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.8-1.fc31 xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.0.1-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc31 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc31 stella-6.1.2-1.fc31 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc31 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.2.2-1.fc32 mythtv-31.0-3.20200527gitfc90482281.fc32 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.8-1.fc32 xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.0.1-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc32 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc32 stella-6.1.2-1.fc32 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc32 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: ffmpeg-3.4.7-2.el7 libopenshot-0.2.5-2.el7 libopenshot-audio-0.2.0-1.el7 openshot-2.5.1-1.el7 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: rfpkg-1.26.3-2.el8 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el8 Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

1 year, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Upgrade from Fedora 30 -> 31 fails with MythTV conflict

by Dave Ulrick

Now that Fedora 30 has reached EOL, I'm upgrading my Fedora 30 systems to Fedora 31. Just now I started my upgrades on a mini-PC that acts as a MythTV front end. First, I ran 'dnf --refresh upgrade' to pull in all Fedora 30 upgrades, then I ran 'dnf system-upgrade'. Unfortunately, the upgrade fails during the transaction test. Excerpt from the 'dnf system-upgrade' output: # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 ... Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transactio n. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/libmythavutil.so.56 conflicts between attempted installs of my thtv-libs-30.0-12.20190904git5cde0578d8.fc31.x86_64 and mythffmpeg-31.0-1.fc31.x 86_64 Usually I resolve this kind of issue by doing 'dnf remove' on one of the conflicting packages, but in this instance both mythtv-libs and mythffmpeg have so many dependencies that I'd essentially be removing all of MythTV from the system. I'm OK with doing that since this particular system is just a MythTV front end, but I was hoping that there was a less drastic solution. Any suggestions??? I install MythTV using the RPM Fusion RPMs, hence my post to this list. Thanks, Dave

1 year, 1 month

4
9
0 / 0

Nvidia Optimus and nvidia-prime, prime-select

by Sérgio Basto

Hi, I finally manage to put my Nvidia as primary GPU, with [1], we got several references on internet [2] and I'd check as mint and ubuntu have prime-select nvidia [3] tool, to do this automatically, I guess. I think we could improve our wiki page Howto/NVIDIA and Howto/Optimus ... Best regards, [1] cat /etc/sddm/Xsetup xrandr --setprovideroutputsource modesetting NVIDIA-G0 xrandr --auto and the attached file [2] https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/official-driver-384-59-with-geforce... https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8447514.html?sid=2557e84be8c07d590c... https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NVIDIA/Optimus#Simple_Desktop_Display_Manage... https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers/Optimus http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/440.44/README/primerender... [3] https://github.com/linuxmint/nvidia-prime/blob/master/prime-offload -- Sérgio M. B.

1 year, 2 months

2
8
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2020-05-24

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: kdenlive-20.04.1-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.fc31 mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: kdenlive-20.04.1-1.fc31 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.7-2.fc31 simplescreenrecorder-0.4.2-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.fc32 kodi-18.7-1.fc32 mpv-mpris-0.5-1.fc32 zsnes-1.51-28.fc32 Pushed to stable: kdenlive-20.04.1-1.fc32 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.7-2.fc32 simplescreenrecorder-0.4.2-1.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: VirtualBox-6.1.8-2.el7 VirtualBox-kmod-6.1.8-2.el7 simplescreenrecorder-0.4.2-1.el7 xine-lib-1.2.10-6.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: ffmpeg-4.2.3-2.el8 Pushed to stable: simplescreenrecorder-0.4.2-1.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc30 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-2.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc31 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: SDLPoP-1.20-3.fc31 broadcom-bt-firmware-12.0.1.1105-8.fc31 steam-1.0.0.62-2.fc31 unifi-5.12.72-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.fc32 ripcord-0.4.25-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: SDLPoP-1.20-3.fc32 broadcom-bt-firmware-12.0.1.1105-8.fc32 pcsx2-1.6.0-2.fc32 pgplot-5.2.2-49.fc32 steam-1.0.0.62-2.fc32 unifi-5.12.72-1.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-4.el6 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-340.108-2.el6 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.el7 Pushed to stable: broadcom-bt-firmware-12.0.1.1105-8.el7 nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-3.el7 nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-4.el7 steam-1.0.0.62-2.el7 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-340.108-2.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: dvb-firmware-20170329-7.git3fef04a.el8 Pushed to stable: broadcom-bt-firmware-12.0.1.1105-8.el8 nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-3.el8 nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-4.el8 steam-1.0.0.62-2.el8 unifi-5.12.72-1.el8 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-340.108-2.el8 Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Certificate expired

by kim-rpmf＠roedderne.dk

RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free - Updates 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:01 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rpmfusion-free-updates': - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-updates-released-... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-updates-released-... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:02 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rpmfusion-free': - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-32&arch=x86_64 [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=free-fedora-32&arch=x86_64 [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree tainted 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rpmfusion-nonfree-tainted': - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-tainted-32&arc... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-tainted': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-tainted-32&arc... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:02 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates': - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-updates-releas... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-updates-releas... [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:01 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rpmfusion-nonfree': - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-32&arch=x86_64 [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK for https://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/metalink?repo=nonfree-fedora-32&arch=x86_64 [SSL certificate problem: certificate has expired] Ignoring repositories: rpmfusion-free-updates, rpmfusion-free, rpmfusion-nonfree-tainted, rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, rpmfusion-nonfree

1 year, 2 months

2
1
0 / 0

SSL certificate expired on mirrors.rpmfusion.org on may 23, 2020

by philippe.lemaire＠protonmail.com

Hello guys, I believe you should have a chat with certbot, the certificate just expired :) Regards, Phil

1 year, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion configuration page

by Matti Pulkkinen

Hello, The last command on the configuration page at https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration does not seem to work quite right at the moment. When I tried to execute "sudo dnf install \*-firmware" I got a transaction test error, which I've attached as a text file. The first word just means "error" but the rest is in English. It's not a very big deal, really. Excluding one of the problematic packages – which was fine at least in my case, because both packages seem rather niche – allows the installation to go through just fine. I just thought maybe this section of the web page could be revised somehow to take this file conflict into account. This would make for a smoother experience for people going through the instructions. Big deal or no, I doubt anyone wants to see errors popping up. -- Terveisin / Regards, Matti Pulkkinen

1 year, 2 months

3
5
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

rpmfusion-users May 2020