On Thursday 20 August 2015 16:27:15 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.08.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> Updated software via GUI.
> new kernel 4.1.5-200.fc22.x86_64
>
> Usual song and dance.
> #akmod --force worked as previously.
and you are sure the timers are not running?
"disable" is bulls** if you really want something not have started
* enable: start units unconditional
* disable: start units on triggers/demand
* mask: never start soemthing
systemctl mask dnf-makecache.service
systemctl mask dnf-makecache.timer
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30720786/cannot-disable-systemd-service
I have not hit any problem with using disable in practice. But Its nice to
know about mask, thanks for the info.
Barry
> On 24 July 2015 at 15:17, Barry Scott <barry(a)barrys-emacs.org> wrote:
>> I did some investigation as to why akmod will fail to install a
>> the nvidia dirver when a new kernel turns up.
>>
>> The problem is that dnf-makecache.service runs at the same time
>> as akmods.service. DNF locks the RPM data base which prevents
>> akmods from installing the RPM's it built.
>>
>> Here is a extract from 346.72-2.1-for-4.0.8-300.fc22.x86_64.failed.log
>>
>> Running transaction
>> RPMDB already locked by 2285
>>
>> The application with PID 2285 is: dnf
>>
>> Memory : 116 M RSS (677 MB VSZ)
>> Started: Sat Jul 18 12:09:56 2015 - 06:20 ago
>> State : Sleeping
>>
>> 2015/07/18 12:16:16 akmods: Could not install newly built RPMs. You can
>> find them and the logfile 2015/07/18 12:16:16 akmods:
>> 346.72-2.1-for-4.0.8-300.fc22.x86_64.failed.log
>> in /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/ Looking in the journal shows dnf-makecache
>> running at the time that akmods.service need RPMDB access.
>>
>> I ended up working around the issue with:
>> systemctl disable dnf-makecache.service
>> systemctl disable dnf-makecache.timer
>>
>> I'm not sure what the right systemd unit change will be to have a
>> reliable start up. How do you prevent dnf-makecache from running
>> until after akmods.service has run given that started off a timer?
>>
>> At the next kernel release I'll know if this is successful