Re: what about soname bumps and rebuilds

On Ter, 2015-11-10 at 11:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 02.11.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto: >>> On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> Fedora 23 >>>> >>>> * x264 so 148 >>>> * avidemux requires so 142 >>>> * the gstreamer ugly requires so 142 >>>> >>>> why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264 >>>> without take care of rebuild depending packages? >>>> >>> >>> Where you got x264 so 148 ? >> >> rpmfusion testing most likely? >> >>> it happens , hold your breath please >> >> for how long? >> >> 6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt >> normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all >> >> [root@rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148 > > congratulations, avidemux dependencies are now broken in stable updates > too even for Fedora 21 > > F21: > Error: Package: avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc21.x86_64 > (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) > > F23: > nothing provides libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) needed by > avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 > nothing provides libx264.so.142 needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.i686 > > thanks god it can't solve i686 deps on a pure x86_64 machine where > dnf/yum tries to fallback because the unsolveable deps.... https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3815