5:12 p.m.
Any particular reason why we are not moving to VLC 2.0.7 in fedora rawhide
and fedora 19 and just a minimal update to 2.0.6-1?
7:09 p.m.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Another Sillyname
<anothersname(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
VLC isn't in rawhide, it's in rpmfusion.
On 30 May 2013 18:12, piruthiviraj natarajan <piruthiviraj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any particular reason why we are not moving to VLC 2.0.7 in fedora
> rawhide
> and fedora 19 and just a minimal update to 2.0.6-1?
>
I meant rpmfusion-rawhide. Sorry for the confusion.
7:22 p.m.
On Sex, 2013-05-31 at 00:39 +0530, piruthiviraj natarajan wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Another Sillyname
<anothersname(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> VLC isn't in rawhide, it's in rpmfusion.
>
> On 30 May 2013 18:12, piruthiviraj natarajan <piruthiviraj(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Any particular reason why we are not moving to VLC 2.0.7 in fedora
> > rawhide
> > and fedora 19 and just a minimal update to 2.0.6-1?
> >
I meant rpmfusion-rawhide. Sorry for the confusion.
seeing commits is on the way, for F17+
--
Sérgio M. B.
4076
days inactive
4076
days old
rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Another Sillyname -
piruthiviraj natarajan -
Sérgio Basto