2:46 p.m.
I just updated my main workstation to Fedora 25 (via dnf system-
upgrade), and Xorg is consistently crashing.
[ 67.417] (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode
"DFP-1.8:nvidia-auto-select,DFP-3:nvidia-auto-select"
[ 67.764] (EE)
[ 67.764] (EE) Backtrace:
[ 67.765] (EE) 0: /usr/libexec/Xorg (OsLookupColor+0x139) [0x59e229]
[ 67.765] (EE) 1: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (__restore_rt+0x0) [0x7f0a5f8a65bf]
[ 67.765] (EE) 2: /usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.370.28
(nvidiaAddDrawableHandler+0x5589de) [0x7f0a5a69b93c]
[ 67.765] (EE)
[ 67.765] (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x10
[ 67.765] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[ 67.765] (EE) Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
[ 67.765] (EE)
[ 67.765] (EE)
I had been running this same version of nvidia drivers on f24 with no problems:
$ rpm -qa \*nvidia\* xorg-x11-server-Xorg\* kernel
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc-370.28-6.fc25.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-370.28-6.fc25.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-370.28-6.fc25.i686
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-370.28-6.fc25.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64-370.28-1.fc24.x86_64
kernel-4.7.9-200.fc24.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-4.7.9-200.fc24.x86_64-367.57-1.fc24.x86_64
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.19.0-0.3.20161026.fc25.x86_64
kernel-4.8.6-300.fc25.x86_64
kernel-4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64
akmod-nvidia-370.28-1.fc25.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-4.8.6-300.fc25.x86_64-370.28-1.fc25.x86_64
My guess is that something changed in the version of Xorg between f24
and f25. Anyone else seeing this? nvidia-bug-report is attached.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)poochiereds.net>
9:25 p.m.
On 11/13/16 22:46, Jeff Layton wrote:
My guess is that something changed in the version of Xorg between
f24
and f25. Anyone else seeing this? nvidia-bug-report is attached.
Yes. Look further up in the log. You'll see that the nVidia drivers are not
compatible
with the latest version of Xorg supplied with F25.
You could probably get around it by dumping in the F24 versions of Xorg or wait to see
when/if nVidia supports the Fedora supplied version.
9:57 p.m.
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:46:15 -0500
Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)poochiereds.net> wrote:
I just updated my main workstation to Fedora 25 (via dnf system-
upgrade), and Xorg is consistently crashing.
[snip]
My guess is that something changed in the version of Xorg between
f24
and f25. Anyone else seeing this? nvidia-bug-report is attached.
Your guess is correct. X went from 1.18 to 1.19. Seems it should have
gone to 2.0 since it is not backward compatible. Below is a message
from an rpmfusion admin about this.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:56:14 +0100
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's certainly not trivial to make the nvidia driver works on
f25.
At least I've updated the Howto to mention that nvidia isn't
compatible with Xorg server 1.19.
http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
11:03 p.m.
Am 13.11.2016 um 22:57 schrieb stan:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:46:15 -0500
Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)poochiereds.net> wrote:
> I just updated my main workstation to Fedora 25 (via dnf system-
> upgrade), and Xorg is consistently crashing.
[snip]
> My guess is that something changed in the version of Xorg between f24
> and f25. Anyone else seeing this? nvidia-bug-report is attached.
Your guess is correct. X went from 1.18 to 1.19. Seems it should have
gone to 2.0 since it is not backward compatible. Below is a message
from an rpmfusion admin about this
why should it have gone to 2.0?
because you are using hardware with a blob-driver?
no, you are at your own - there is no reason to run a NON-RELEASED
fedora-version with binary drivers and in fact no reason to use hardware
which won't work out of the box in 2016 - said from someonbe who is
using proper hardware on Fedora for many years
why in the world do you play around with F25 when your hardware depends
on a commercial vendor where Linus had the right sign long ago?
stay at F24 and be happy - that's it!
2:15 a.m.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:03:50 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
why should it have gone to 2.0?
because you are using hardware with a blob-driver?
Actually, I'm using the open source radeon driver, with a 4.9 kernel.
I would expect that to work without alteration if X 1.19 was compatible
with X 1.18.
no, you are at your own - there is no reason to run a NON-RELEASED
fedora-version with binary drivers and in fact no reason to use
hardware which won't work out of the box in 2016 - said from someonbe
who is using proper hardware on Fedora for many years
In rawhide, with 1.19, there are graphics issues. In F25, with 1.18,
there are no issues. Same hardware. In F25, with 1.19 the same issues
as appear in rawhide occur. That to me is backward incompatibility,
and should be flagged via the version number. YMMV
why in the world do you play around with F25 when your hardware
depends on a commercial vendor where Linus had the right sign long
ago?
That's why I switched to amd graphics. I can use the latest kernels
without worrying about drivers.
2717
days inactive
2718
days old
rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ed Greshko -
Jeff Layton -
Reindl Harald -
stan