I opened MythWeb after upgrading to Fedora 22 found that it couldn't connect to port :6543 I found this in the MythBackend log file 2015-08-20 18:03:10.717807 C [1525/1525] CoreContext serverpool.cpp:267 (SelectDefaultListen) - ServerPool: Host is configured to listen on 192.168.0.2, but address is not used on any local network interfaces. [root@mythbox .mythtv]# netstat -n | grep ":6543" tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:44792 127.0.0.1:6543 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:44791 127.0.0.1:6543 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6543 127.0.0.1:44791 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6543 127.0.0.1:44792 ESTABLISHED I googled a few solutions about and found that a SSD base solution was starting backend before network is initialized. Do I need to add another prereq to systemd config? eg Wants=network-online.target to mythbackend.service

Paul

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Barry Scott <barry(a)barrys-emacs.org&gt; wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2015 06:51:33 Paul Wilson wrote: > > I opened MythWeb after upgrading to Fedora 22 found that it couldn't > > connect to port :6543 > > > > > > I found this in the MythBackend log file > > > > 2015-08-20 18:03:10.717807 C [1525/1525] CoreContext serverpool.cpp:267 > > (SelectDefaultListen) - ServerPool: Host is configured to listen on > > 192.168.0.2, but address is not used on any local network interfaces. > > > > [root@mythbox .mythtv]# netstat -n | grep ":6543" > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:44792 127.0.0.1:6543 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:44791 127.0.0.1:6543 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6543 127.0.0.1:44791 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6543 127.0.0.1:44792 > > ESTABLISHED > > > > > > I googled a few solutions about and found that a SSD base solution was > > starting backend before network is initialized. > > > > Do I need to add another prereq to systemd config? > > eg > > Wants=network-online.target to mythbackend.service Are you using my systemd unit file from RPM Fusion? It's already setup to startup after network-online.target. I'm not sure if using Wants=... will do much because it's a target, not a service. Thanks, Richard

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Paul Wilson <mylists(a)wilsononline.id.au&gt; wrote: > Is the rpm fusion installed with the package? > I did modify my copy to add wants for my dvb tuner. > I eventually saw a copy on mythtv.org which I notice had another After > unit netmanager which I think should fix the problem I've never heard of a unit/service called netmanager... Doubt it will fix anything but good luck!