[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr...
Description:
Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex
network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices
ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers.
It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which
allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm
gns3.i586: E: no-binary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any
binary.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 2 months
[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
Bug #: 3335
Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec.
It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple
API makes it easy to integrate it into other software.
The package was rejected for Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC
implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as
previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information.
Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated.
This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and
sponsor it.
rpmlint output for the RPMs:
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> "codec" is just fine for this.
libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
-> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the
package just fine with wget or curl.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
-> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's
fine.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec ->
codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
-> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet.
Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
-----
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
Bug #: 2433
Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of
extra plugins for Qmmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr...
Description:
Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora.
* MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library
I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description
... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740
rpmlint output:
[kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 2518] New: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518
Bug #: 2518
Summary: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0...
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0...
Description :
This plugin enables VDR to write compliant DVDs from VDR recordings
while being able to control the process and to watch progress from
inside VDRs on-screen-display. If the selected recordings don't fit
the DVD, the video tracks are requantized (shrinked) automatically.
The created menus support multipage descriptions (in case the
recording summary exceeds one page).
rpmlint output:
rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized ->
quarantined
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked,
shrink ed, shrink-ed
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage -> multistage
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized ->
quarantined
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked,
shrink ed, shrink-ed
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage ->
multistage
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters/standard
vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post perl
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
The link exists on a installed package vdr-burn:
ll /etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 41 Oct 7 19:55
/etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf ->
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
The package is a update of the previous vdr-burn for fc17 from
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-17-rpmfusion_free/12218-vdr-bur...
There exists no bug report from vdr-burn so I have created a new bug review.
The package was marked as orphaned
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=free&view=co
Fedora|vdr-burn|DVD writing plugin for VDR|orphaned||
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months
[Bug 3095] New: Review request: netfabb-basic - Freeware suite for STL editing
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3095
Bug #: 3095
Summary: Review request: netfabb-basic - Freeware suite for STL
editing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/netfabb-basic.spec
SRPM:
http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
netfabb Basic is a free (as in free beer) software for 3D Printing
and the STL file format. Numerous tools allow all steps of the fabrication
process: editing, repairing, positioning, slicing and exporting triangulated
CAD data. For professional use, the author offers commercial support and
additional modules.
This does obviously not go into Fedora, as it is nonfree. It goes to nonfree
section.
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable
Not quite sure what license to use here, so if this is not OK, just give me the
hint.
netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-url Source1: netfabb-basic_5.0.1_linux64.tar.gz
netfabb-basic.src: W: invalid-url Source0: netfabb-basic_5.0.1_linux32.tar.gz
Sources has no public URL, commented in the spec.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/netfabb-basic-5.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
netfabb-basic.x86_64: W: invalid-license Redistributable
Already addressed.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years, 10 months