Package maintainers, please read: freshrpms specs and patches/small sources uploaded, please check them and re-merge if needed
7:10 p.m.
Hi all!
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar,
*zip, *run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/freshrpms-sources/
(Full srpms can be found here if needed:
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/ )
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of
those packages that were in multiple repos was done properly!
Yes, all the packages that have been imported to RPM Fusion's CVS afaik
were "merged" with their counterparts from freshrpms; but most of the
time those merges happened months ago, so now is the right time to
recheck and re-merge, because matthias might have done some improvements
in the freshrpms packages over the past few weeks and months that
haven't found their way into the packages that are in CVS for RPM Fusion
right now. While at it also please make sure that the upgrade path from
freshrpms -> RPM Fusion works fine (e.g. the EVR in RPM Fusion needs to
be higher than in freshrpms).
Thanks for your cooperation.
CU
knurd
7:42 p.m.
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>:
Hi all!
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar, *zip,
*run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/freshrpms-sources/
(Full srpms can be found here if needed:
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/ )
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of those
packages that were in multiple repos was done properly!
Yes, all the packages that have been imported to RPM Fusion's CVS afaik were
"merged" with their counterparts from freshrpms; but most of the time those
merges happened months ago, so now is the right time to recheck and
re-merge, because matthias might have done some improvements in the
freshrpms packages over the past few weeks and months that haven't found
their way into the packages that are in CVS for RPM Fusion right now. While
at it also please make sure that the upgrade path from freshrpms -> RPM
Fusion works fine (e.g. the EVR in RPM Fusion needs to be higher than in
freshrpms).
I have prepared some work:
dvdrip:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/9/SRPMS/dvdrip-0.98.9-1.fc9.src.rpm
It is known to build without missing dependencies, as all perl
dependencies are already in fedora. Only perl-Coro is still in Work in
Progress in Fedora. (needs perl-EV that needs libev).
For now I don't known which package needs perl-Coro in freshrpms...
At this time dvdrip still requires ogmtools which have been obsoleted
previously in livna.
It needs to be corrected according to if the package is available.
I can offer to import this package. I'm not particularly interested in
maintainance.
Cinelerra-cv
Cinelerra have seen some changes and improvements recently. I'm
already in touch with upstream and i've worked on a libmpeg-1.8 built
shared (the cinelerra-cv package will use it).
The most recent needs which is a legal issue requires to rename the
cinelerra package to cinelerra-cv because we will built the
CommunityVersion (and not the HerroineVirtual version).
There is a FOSS HV version which the CV is based on. But if you don't
have a headack trying to "compile" it , you will better buy support
for the closed source HV version.
the namespace rename will follow the package rename later. form the
git repository for the cinelerra-cv version.
I'm interested in co-maintainance.
(merge review will come soon)
mpeg123/mpeg321:
I think we need to pick one of theses (the more recent one)
I have tried to raise this problem previously but without success
(might fill a bug)
The current mpeg321 in rpmfusion will obsoletes mpeg123 which is newer.
This is not acceptable. They should at least be parallele installable.
But IMO we should just pick the more recent one. (mpeg123)
mac should be in nonfree. if someone is interested.
lame should be updated (if it work at least):
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63
I haven't checked others softwares from freshrpms
Thanks for your cooperation.
CU
knurd
7:45 p.m.
2008/10/16 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>:
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of those
packages that were in multiple repos was done properly!
I just had gnuboy. It is still merged correctly, freshrpms package
hasn't changed since 2006.
Bye,
Andrea.
2:41 p.m.
On 16.10.2008 21:10, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:>
I just downloaded the latest F8 and F9 srpm for all freshrpms
packages,
extracted them using rpmdev-extract, moved the big source files (*tar,
*zip, *run, *bz2, *gz, ...) away and uploaded everything else to:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/freshrpms-sources/
(Full srpms can be found here if needed:
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/ )
@packages: If your package was in dribble or livna as well as in
freshrpms(¹) then for the sake of the RPM Fusion project and the merge
between those three reps: please go and recheck now that the merge of
those packages that were in multiple repos was done properly!
[...]
FYI, seems at least the maintainers of lame and xine afaics did not to
that yet, otherwise they would have noticed that both packages have a
higher EVR in freshrpms ;-)
So please: go and check you packages if you didn't do that already. This
is a repo merge and thus
- we should do our best to have a sane update path for users of each repo
- we should make sure that the best bits from spec files that are in
multiple repos make it into RPM Fusion
tia!
Cu
knurd
5671
days inactive
5674
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrea Musuruane -
Nicolas Chauvet -
Thorsten Leemhuis