Summary: Review request: frogatto - An old-school 2D platform
Product: Package Reviews
Component: Review Request
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Because of the large size of the upstream source package and the small size of
my web space I made a nosrc.rpm.
Please download the tarball with:
$ spectool -g frogatto.spec
An old-school 2D platform game, starring a certain quixotic frog. Frogatto
has gorgeous, high-end pixel art, pumping arcade tunes, and all the gameplay
nuance of a classic console title. Run and jump over pits and enemies. Grab
enemies with your tongue, swallow them, and then spit them out at other enemies
as projectiles! Fight dangerous bosses, and solve vexing puzzles. Collect coins
and use them to buy upgrades and new abilities in the store. Talk to characters
in game, and work to unravel Big Bad Milgram's plot against the townsfolk!
* Why not in Fedora?
This package is not eligible for Fedora because its data are not
released under a Fedora acceptable license ("Good Licenses"):
Upstream has given its explicit consensus in packaging Frogatto for
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/frogatto-1.0-1.fc12.nosrc.rpm
frogatto.nosrc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play,
frogatto.nosrc: W: invalid-license proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/frogatto-1.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
frogatto.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play,
frogatto.x86_64: W: invalid-license proprietary
rpmli1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
frogatto-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
License is not valid for Fedora but good for RPM Fusion (nonfree repository).
Ignore the spelling of gameplay - it is correct AFAIK.
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.