8:41 a.m.
Hi all.
I purpose to include a
MOC<http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmoc.daper.net%2F&ei=petvUIvqAYnAtAa0loD4Aw&usg=AFQjCNEXfItHPaL2OA8gKWYwzeMelTPutg>package
in RPMFusion repositories. Within few days will be available a new
beta release and I'm reading your Guide
Lines<http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Becoming_a_RPM_Fusion_contribu...
order to get ready for open a new package review request.
In the meantime i would like ask you:
Together with MOC I packaged two libraries requested, libRCC and libRCD
(homepage:http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net); I suppose that I must open a
package review request for everyone. Is it right ?
Regards.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
9:21 a.m.
2012/10/6 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>:
Hi all.
I purpose to include a MOC package in RPMFusion repositories. Within few
days will be available a new beta release and I'm reading your Guide Lines
in order to get ready for open a new package review request.
In the meantime i would like ask you:
Hi Antonio,
Thx for your interest in RPM Fusion!
Looking at MOC, this sound like a deprecated software, there is no
update since 2005 at the first sight.Does it really worth to maintain
that package ? Can't you find another software for that purpose (such
as sox) ?
Just in case you want others packaging idea:
http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
Nicolas (kwizart)
9:27 a.m.
2012/10/6 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com>
2012/10/6 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>:
> Hi all.
>
> I purpose to include a MOC package in RPMFusion repositories. Within few
> days will be available a new beta release and I'm reading your Guide
Lines
> in order to get ready for open a new package review request.
> In the meantime i would like ask you:
Hi Antonio,
Thx for your interest in RPM Fusion!
Looking at MOC, this sound like a deprecated software, there is no
update since 2005 at the first sight.Does it really worth to maintain
that package ? Can't you find another software for that purpose (such
as sox) ?
Just in case you want others packaging idea:
http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
Nicolas (kwizart)
Hi Nicolas.
MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories (
http://moc.daper.net/download).
My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/
The next beta will be released soon.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
9:29 a.m.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nicolas.
MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories
(http://moc.daper.net/download).
My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/
The next beta will be released soon.
There is already a pending (and stalled?) review request for MOC in RPM Fusion:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789
Bye,
Andrea.
9:36 a.m.
2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Antonio Trande
<anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Nicolas.
>
> MOC is still in development, see SVN repositories
> (http://moc.daper.net/download).
> My RPMs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/moc/
>
> The next beta will be released soon.
There is already a pending (and stalled?) review request for MOC in RPM
Fusion:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789
Bye,
Andrea.
Hi Andrea.
No problem. I can complete the
Bug789<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789>or open
another one.
About libRCC/libRCD ?
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
9:46 a.m.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
one.
Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
submitter is still interested.
The review seems stalled to me.
About libRCC/libRCD ?
You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
Regards,
Andrea.
10:10 a.m.
2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande
<anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
one.
Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
submitter is still interested.
The review seems stalled to me.
> About libRCC/libRCD ?
You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
Regards,
Andrea.
Ah, ok. The last comment
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is of
May 2010.
At the comment 17
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri Timofeev
says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
packages) .
Actually is someone still interested to it ?
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
10:48 a.m.
2012/10/6 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
>
> The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
> ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
> longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
> one.
>
> Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
> submitter is still interested.
>
> The review seems stalled to me.
> > About libRCC/libRCD ?
>
> You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea.
>
Ah, ok. The last comment
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is
of May 2010.
At the comment 17 <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri
Timofeev says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
packages) .
Actually is someone still interested to it ?
Raymond Lu doesn't reply me by mail (I sent a mail to rayllu(a)yahoo.com).
Please let me know what you want to do regarding
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 or else I give up for
now.
Regards.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
10:58 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Raymond Lu doesn't reply me by mail (I sent a mail to
rayllu(a)yahoo.com).
Please let me know what you want to do regarding
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 or else I give up for
now.
Update the ticket asking him there if he is still interested. If he doesn't
reply in a week or two, open a new one submitting your package and close
#789 as a duplicate of the one you will open.
Bye,
Andrea.
12:03 p.m.
Hi all.
The MOC Package Review
Request<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2531>is filed
since some days.
Please, let me know if it is satisfactory.
Regards
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: **D400D6C4*
12:22 p.m.
2012/10/18 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
Hi all.
The MOC Package Review
Request<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2531>is filed.
Regards
How long should I wait to unlock bug #30 ? :)
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: **D400D6C4*
12:31 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com>wrote:
How long should I wait to unlock bug #30 ? :)
This may help you:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
Bye,
Andrea.
4202
days inactive
4220
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
11 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrea Musuruane -
Antonio Trande -
Nicolas Chauvet