http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-06 21:44:53 --- (In reply to comment #1) ... I may have warned the list few months ago multiple times about this case (despite not knowing the entire history about free/nonfree). So, agreed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #4 from Lubos Stanek <lubek(a)users.sourceforge.net&gt; 2009-04-06 23:03:39 --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, I do not want to kill your enthusiasm in kicking out a package in the interest of providing another package with the similar or the same functionality but... it is like jumping from one extreme end to the other. The mpg321 package has been proving its functionality over years, it is maintained by the Debian folks (e.g. no maintenance cost except an update once a year or so). And it is substantially smaller when the space matters. It does not interfere. I have provided the solution to distribute both packages for the benefit of the end user. I would not remove it from the distribution unless it could not be built or it would contain serious security or functional bugs. But my vote is not a casting one, the final decision depends on you, packagers. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #6 from Lubos Stanek <lubek(a)users.sourceforge.net&gt; 2009-04-27 12:51:49 --- The http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg123.spec file has been updated to the latest version. The http://www.lubek.name/test/mpg321.spec has been updated as well due to a mistake in the post script Since there are no takers, would you be so kind and dust off the draft for staging and replacement repositories? This package can go directly to any of them. The end users would benefit from it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Summary|Review request: mpg123 - |mpg123 - distribute the |Fast console MPEG Audio |package in the free repo |Player and decoder library | --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt; 2009-04-27 13:09:10 --- (In reply to comment #6) This bug is neither blocking RF_NEW (Bug 2) nor RF_REVIEW (Bug 3), so it's not obvious that this is a review at all. Please block 2 if you wait for a reviewer and 3 if there is one already. Statements like that are IMHO a reason not do do them. Either a package has somebody that is willing to take care of them or it has not. if not then it shouldn't be in our repos IMHO. IWO: If you want your package reviewed and in the repos please consider to become a package maintainer and try to exchange a review with someone else. If you don't want to become a packager and if nobody picks this package up then I'd suggest we close this bug as "WONTFIX" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498 --- Comment #10 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-27 13:13:25 --- (In reply to comment #9) True, I've missed that the spec was made from "whoever takes it". This is definitly not a Review Request... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.