https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2, 30 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-08-20 15:30:57 CEST --- Blocking RF_NEW (bug #2)and NEEDSPONSORS (bug #30). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2012-08-20 17:15:30 CEST --- rpmlint output: yle-dl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boxee -> boxer, boxes, boxen yle-dl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US boxee -> boxer, boxes, boxen yle-dl.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.1 ['2.0.1-2.fc17', '2.0.1-2'] yle-dl.x86_64: E: no-binary yle-dl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yle-dl yle-dl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. ** Fix the changelog entry. ** The package only contains a Python script. Thus, add BuildRequires: python-devel BuildArch: noarch ** Drop the make command make DESTDIR=%{_usr} prefix=%{_usr} INC=-I/usr/include/json which isn't necessary in the 2.0 series (there's nothing to build). ** %{_bindir}/* Please don't use wildcards where they are not necessary. Just write %{_bindir}/yle-dl instead. ** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - Appropriate for rpmfusion since package requires rtmpdump, which is only available in RPMFusion. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - After changes requested above. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK $ sha1sum yle-dl-2.0.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/yle-dl-2.0.1.tar.gz 6b9e75c60a2b678059da9686e934281c768c79c7 yle-dl-2.0.1.tar.gz 6b9e75c60a2b678059da9686e934281c768c79c7 ../SOURCES/yle-dl-2.0.1.tar.gz MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK EPEL: Clean section exists. OK EPEL: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK EPEL: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2012-08-20 18:05:28 CEST --- Instead of removing the %build section entirely, you can just put in an empty one, which cures the rpmlint warning. Also, please fix the tabbing on the added Requires and BuildArch lines. The package has been APPROVED for rpmfusion-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449 Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449 Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi&gt; 2012-08-29 12:55:05 CEST --- ouki douki, this has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.