1:03 p.m.
I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
EL-5?
I tried rebuild srpms, got as far as:
rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
Installing buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
...
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE is needed by
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.3-2.fc9.i686.xen is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
1:24 p.m.
On 05.09.2008 15:10, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/9/5 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>:
> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
> EL-5?
Yes, the plan is to have akmods i n EL-5 as well. But it's untested as
of now, so there might be some problems; shouldn't be to hard to get
those fixed supported, but my focus is a bit more on "get RPM Fusion
running for Fedora" right now, that's why I haven't worked on it yet.
Is there a sense in having akmod for EL?
Definitely: alternative kernels, e.g. self-compiled or pre-compiled from
3rd party repos.
Cu
knurd
1:27 p.m.
On Friday 05 September 2008, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/9/5 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>:
> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff
> to EL-5?
Is there a sense in having akmod for EL? AFAIK the EL kernel is ABI
stable. Therefore kmod should be enough.
Bye,
Andrea.
I have 2 packages that were built accoring to akmods (AFAIK):
blcr-kmod-0.7.3-1.fc9.src.rpm
blcr-0.7.3-1.src.rpm
I cannot build blcr-kmod on EL-5, due to:
rpmbuild -ba --target i686 blcr-kmod.spec
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-newest-i686 is needed by blcr-
kmod-0.7.3-1.nb.i686
So I tried to build buildsys-build-rpmfusion...
1:34 p.m.
On 05.09.2008 15:27, Neal Becker wrote:
[...]
I cannot build blcr-kmod on EL-5, due to:
rpmbuild -ba --target i686 blcr-kmod.spec
Try
rpmbuild -ba --target i686 blcr-kmod.spec --define "kernel $(uname -r)"
But as I said, there might be problems depending on the kmodtool you
use. The patches in the thread
http://livna.org/pipermail/freeworld/2008-August/003169.html
might help.
[...]
Cu
knurd
1:35 p.m.
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/9/5 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>:
> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
> EL-5?
Is there a sense in having akmod for EL? AFAIK the EL kernel is ABI
stable. Therefore kmod should be enough.
No the EL kernel is API stable, not ABI stable. Kernel modules always
have a strict dependency on the exact kernel they were compiled against,
and RHEL does push kernel updates regularly (although not as frequently
as Fedora).
2:12 p.m.
On Friday 05 September 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 05.09.2008 15:27, Neal Becker wrote:
> [...]
>
> I cannot build blcr-kmod on EL-5, due to:
> rpmbuild -ba --target i686 blcr-kmod.spec
Try
rpmbuild -ba --target i686 blcr-kmod.spec --define "kernel $(uname -r)"
But as I said, there might be problems depending on the kmodtool you
use. The patches in the thread
http://livna.org/pipermail/freeworld/2008-August/003169.html
might help.
> [...]
Cu
knurd
Thanks, but it's not blcr-kmod that's stopped me, it's that
blcr-kmod says:
%{!?kernels:BuildRequires: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-
kerneldevpkgs-%{?buildforkernels:
%{buildforkernels}}%{!?buildforkernels:current}-%{_target_cpu} }
so that causes:
rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 --define "kernel $(uname -r)" buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
Installing buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
...
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 is needed by buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.3-2.fc9.i686.xen is needed by buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
But trying to build buildsys-build-rpmfusion... fails:
rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 --define "kernel $(uname -r)" buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
...
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 is needed by buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.3-2.fc9.i686.xen is needed by buildsys-build-
rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
2:13 p.m.
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 15:35 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 2008/9/5 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>:
>> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
>> EL-5?
>
> Is there a sense in having akmod for EL? AFAIK the EL kernel is ABI
> stable. Therefore kmod should be enough.
No the EL kernel is API stable, not ABI stable. Kernel modules always
have a strict dependency on the exact kernel they were compiled against,
and RHEL does push kernel updates regularly (although not as frequently
as Fedora).
Incorrect.
The RHEL kernel *is* ABI-stable for a whitelisted set of symbols. Some
3rd-party kernel modules use symbols not on the whitelist, and thus not
guaranteed stable, but it *is* entirely possible to build a kernel
module against the RHEL5 GA kernel and have it load and run fine on the
latest 5.3 development kernel, if it only uses whitelisted symbols.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod(a)wilsonet.com
2:15 p.m.
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:03 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods
stuff to
EL-5?
I tried rebuild srpms, got as far as:
rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
Installing buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
...
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
error: Failed build dependencies:
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE is needed by
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.3-2.fc9.i686.xen is needed by buildsys-
build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
As mentioned, you need to tell it the kernel version you actually want
to build for, but on top of that, the kernel-uname-r Provides: don't
exist in the RHEL5 kernel, only in recent Fedora kernels, so some tweaks
are needed there as well.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod(a)wilsonet.com
2:25 p.m.
On 05.09.2008 16:13, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 15:35 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> 2008/9/5 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>:
>>> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff to
>>> EL-5?
>> Is there a sense in having akmod for EL? AFAIK the EL kernel is ABI
>> stable. Therefore kmod should be enough.
> No the EL kernel is API stable, not ABI stable. Kernel modules always
> have a strict dependency on the exact kernel they were compiled against,
> and RHEL does push kernel updates regularly (although not as frequently
> as Fedora).
Incorrect.
The RHEL kernel *is* ABI-stable for a whitelisted set of symbols. Some
3rd-party kernel modules use symbols not on the whitelist, and thus not
guaranteed stable, but it *is* entirely possible to build a kernel
module against the RHEL5 GA kernel and have it load and run fine on the
latest 5.3 development kernel, if it only uses whitelisted symbols.
And the plan is to use those whitelisted set of symbols in kmods for
EL-5 in RPM Fusion to hopefully avoid that we have to rebuild each and
every kmods for each new EL kernel.
Cu
knurd
3:15 p.m.
On Friday 05 September 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:03 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I need to build my akmod for EL-5. Will there be a port of akmods stuff
> to EL-5?
>
> I tried rebuild srpms, got as far as:
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686
> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm Installing
> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.lvn9.src.rpm
> ...
> Building target platforms: i686
> Building for target i686
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 is needed by
> buildsys- build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
> kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686.PAE is needed by
> buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
> kernel-devel-uname-r = 2.6.25.3-2.fc9.i686.xen is needed by
> buildsys- build-rpmfusion-9.1-10.nb.i686
As mentioned, you need to tell it the kernel version you actually want
to build for, but on top of that, the kernel-uname-r Provides: don't
exist in the RHEL5 kernel, only in recent Fedora kernels, so some tweaks
are needed there as well.
If/when someone has a basic example of akmod that works on fedora+epel, please
post it and I'll try to follow it.
5713
days inactive
5714
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
10 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andrea Musuruane -
Denis Leroy -
Jarod Wilson -
Neal Becker -
Thorsten Leemhuis