11:03 p.m.
It appears that jobs are failing on rawhide due to the xvidcore
package:
Installed size: 534 M
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion...:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 :
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion...
Trying other mirror.
Error Downloading Packages:
xvidcore-1.2.2-1.fc15.x86_64: failure:
xvidcore/1.2.2-1.fc15/x86_64/xvidcore-1.2.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm from
rpmfusion-free-needsign-rawhide: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
Full log here:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/8830...
I also checked some other packages, and they also appear to be failing
for the same reason, e.g.:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=8829
10:04 p.m.
New subject: devel (rawhide) builds should pull from f17 Fedora rawhide
Currently devel builds still pull from f16, rather than f17 Fedora rawhide and
packages still have "fc16" in their tags. This should be fixed ASAP, now that
Fedora 16 is in GA.
Also:
common/branches in CVS shows:
devel:rawhide-free:.fc16:fedora:16
that should be:
devel:rawhide-free:.fc17:fedora:17
and rawhide-free repo needs to point to actual f17, not f16.
See:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031
6:18 p.m.
New subject: Rawhide builds still have .fc16 disttags
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I noticed that the updated common/branches still thinks Rawhide is
Fedora
16. Please fix that! (Also check the builder configs, the Rawhide configs
should actually point to Rawhide now.)
Ping? common/branches is still broken. I "fixed" it by
locally editing the
last line in common/branches to:
devel:rawhide-free:.fc17:fedora:17
but I can't commit it because of those !"ยง$%&/()=? ACLs. Since nobody with
write access can manage to commit a 2-character fix in a timely manner, I
can only suggest to do away with those ACLs and just let everyone commit to
everything. It worked fine in the old Fedora Extras (even owners.list was
world-writable), and RPM Fusion is even smaller than Extras was.
Yep, I noticed this too and opened up a bug:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031
as well as posting earlier here:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-November/0...
but no response as yet. However, kwizart on #rpmfusion said this:
"nope, only two weeks after fedora is released we expect to reopen
rawhide in rpmfusion (still at the frozen rawhide process)"
which doesn't make sense to me since f17 has already been rawhide
for several weeks in upstream Fedora.
Alex
4545
days inactive
4874
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
2 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Alex Lancaster