9:29 a.m.
Hi!
Just a heads up: I plan to create the final F13 release repos over the
next few days by basically moving everything from the updates repos to
the Everything repos(¹). If you want a updated package in there please
tell me until Thursday evening, otherwise it might be to late.
Cu
thl
(¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
case you are not aware)
9:32 a.m.
On 05/18/2010 11:29 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
Just a heads up: I plan to create the final F13 release repos over the
next few days by basically moving everything from the updates repos to
the Everything repos(¹). If you want a updated package in there please
tell me until Thursday evening, otherwise it might be to late.
free updates carries several *.fc14.rpms.
Ralf
9:59 a.m.
Ralf Corsepius wrote on 18.05.2010 11:32:
On 05/18/2010 11:29 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Just a heads up: I plan to create the final F13 release repos over the
> next few days by basically moving everything from the updates repos to
> the Everything repos(¹). If you want a updated package in there please
> tell me until Thursday evening, otherwise it might be to late.
free updates carries several *.fc14.rpms.
/me knew he had forgotten something
Rebuilds queued, thx for the reminder.
CU
knurd
9:39 a.m.
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:29 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
(¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216
Sorry for that. Triggered the rebuild.
--
Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs.
-- Stephen Smoogen
10:24 a.m.
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:29:20 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
Hi!
Just a heads up: I plan to create the final F13 release repos over the
next few days by basically moving everything from the updates repos to
the Everything repos(¹). If you want a updated package in there please
tell me until Thursday evening, otherwise it might be to late.
Cu
thl
(¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
case you are not aware)
cairo-dock will need a rebuild for the new libetpan in F13 updates-testing
11:04 a.m.
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/18/2010 07:24 PM +9:00:
On Tue, 18 May 2010 11:29:20 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just a heads up: I plan to create the final F13 release repos over the
> next few days by basically moving everything from the updates repos to
> the Everything repos(¹). If you want a updated package in there please
> tell me until Thursday evening, otherwise it might be to late.
>
> Cu
> thl
>
> (¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
> case you are not aware)
cairo-dock will need a rebuild for the new libetpan in F13 updates-testing
Yes, however it depends on when new libetpan will be pushed into Fedora's
stable repository (for F-14 rebuild is already done) and (while I am
the maintainer of cairo-dock on rpmfusion-free)it cannot be
controlled by me.
Mamoru
5:20 a.m.
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:03:38 +0200, Kevin wrote:
> cairo-dock will need a rebuild for the new libetpan in F13
updates-testing
That should be done in updates, not in the release repo. The release repo
should match F13 GA, not post-release updates.
Sure, ... I thought RPM Fusion has a way to build against updates-testing,
but I was mistaken.
12:18 p.m.
On 19.05.2010 07:20, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:03:38 +0200, Kevin wrote:
>> cairo-dock will need a rebuild for the new libetpan in F13 updates-testing
> That should be done in updates, not in the release repo. The release repo
> should match F13 GA, not post-release updates.
Sure, ... I thought RPM Fusion has a way to build against updates-testing,
but I was mistaken.
It's possible -- just tell me what you need in the buildroot and I'll
put it there.
Sure, that creates delays and is not really ideal, but works (and kind
of similar to the manual buildroot overrides in Fedora iirc...)
CU
knurd
5:20 a.m.
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
(¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
case you are not aware)
This patch should fix smc to build:
http://repo.calcforge.org/temp/smc-1.9-fix-implicit-linking.patch
You'll also have to BR libX11-devel.
Kevin Kofler
3:09 p.m.
On 19.05.2010 07:20, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> (¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
> case you are not aware)
This patch should fix smc to build:
http://repo.calcforge.org/temp/smc-1.9-fix-implicit-linking.patch
You'll also have to BR libX11-devel.
Many thanks for that. Some more was needed (disclaimer: including a hack
to fix another DSO problem), but then it built Push ion progress.
Cu
knurd
1:54 a.m.
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 19.05.2010 07:20, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> (¹) I sill hope for two fixes: A updated VirtualBox-OSE-kmod package
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 and a new smc
>> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
>> case you are not aware)
> This patch should fix smc to build:
> http://repo.calcforge.org/temp/smc-1.9-fix-implicit-linking.patch
> You'll also have to BR libX11-devel.
Many thanks for that. Some more was needed (disclaimer: including a hack
to fix another DSO problem), but then it built Push ion progress.
I think adding:
# Check for the Boost System library
AC_CHECK_LIB(boost_system, main, ,
AC_MSG_ERROR([Unable to find Boost System library]))
to the configure.ac and rerunning autoconf (the configure was generated by
the same autoconf we have in Fedora 12, it seems; the F13 one is newer
though and will thus generate a larger diff) would be the clean fix for
that.
Kevin Kofler
10:13 a.m.
On 05/25/2010 12:04 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05/18/2010 11:29 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
<snip>
> and a new smc
> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
> case you are not aware)
I thought I already see you do a rebuild for this? I'll look into this
right
away.
Ok further reading the thread and looking at the .spec I see you did
a rebuilt no May 16, and now another one, with patches added. Thx for
taking care of this.
Note that next time you want to reach me, pinging on irc, or a direct
mail or filing a bug is a much better way then a mail to the list.
Mails to the list get filtered into a folder which I read occasionally.
Anyways thanks for taking care of this. I do notice that you've only
made changes to F-13 branch I'll forward "port" them to the devel
branch,
Regards,
Hans
11:03 a.m.
Hans de Goede wrote on 25.05.2010 12:13:
On 05/25/2010 12:04 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 11:29 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> <snip>
>> and a new smc
>> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
>> case you are not aware)
> I thought I already see you do a rebuild for this? I'll look into this
> right
> away.
Ok further reading the thread and looking at the .spec I see you did
a rebuilt no May 16, and now another one, with patches added. Thx for
taking care of this.
Note that next time you want to reach me, pinging on irc,
Sorry, I was still under the assumption you are only occationally on IRC.
or a direct mail
That's why you were CCed on two of the mail in this thread ;-) Maybe
your filters catched them as well?
or filing a bug
That one of my faults, I sometimes feel so tired of bugzilla and
maintainers not catching up that I don't want to deal with bugzilla to much.
Anyways thanks for taking care of this. I do notice that you've
only
made changes to F-13 branch I'll forward "port" them to the devel
branch,
And a proper fix (like Kevin suggested) for my hack might be a good idea.
CU
knurd
11:11 a.m.
Hi,
On 05/25/2010 01:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote on 25.05.2010 12:13:
> On 05/25/2010 12:04 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 05/18/2010 11:29 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> and a new smc
>>> package (looking at you Hans! the current one has unsatisfied deps in
>>> case you are not aware)
>> I thought I already see you do a rebuild for this? I'll look into this
>> right
>> away.
> Ok further reading the thread and looking at the .spec I see you did
> a rebuilt no May 16, and now another one, with patches added. Thx for
> taking care of this.
>
> Note that next time you want to reach me, pinging on irc,
Sorry, I was still under the assumption you are only occationally on IRC.
I'm usually not on #rpmfusion, but during CET business hours I'm on freenode,
so just query hansg.
> or a direct mail
That's why you were CCed on two of the mail in this thread ;-) Maybe
your filters catched them as well?
Yes, that is intentional as peoples sometime tend to CC the author of
a mail when replying to a list.
Regards,
Hans
5085
days inactive
5092
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
15 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Hans de Goede -
Kevin Kofler -
Lubomir Rintel -
Mamoru Tasaka -
Michael Schwendt -
Ralf Corsepius -
Thorsten Leemhuis