September 2019 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5268] New: Review request: dptfxtract - Utility to generate a thermald configuration from DPTF

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268 Bug ID: 5268 Summary: Review request: dptfxtract - Utility to generate a thermald configuration from DPTF Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: benjamin(a)sipsolutions.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree spec file: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract.spec SRPM: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract-1.3-1.fc30.src.rpm RPM: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract-1.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm Upstream: https://github.com/intel/dptfxtract Description: This is a companion tool to Linux Thermal Daemon (thermald). This tool tries to reuse some of the tables used by "Intel ® Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework (Intel® DPTF)" by converting to the thermal_conf.xml format used by thermald. Integration with thermald is included so that that a thermald configuration will be created automatically if thermald is enabled. This package is not eligible for Fedora as dptfxtract is a non-free executable. The executable is freely distributable. Note that I have chosen to enable the extraction by default when installed by adding an appropriate symlink for thermald.service.wants. RPM Lint: dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thermald -> thermals, thermal, thermal d dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thermald -> thermals, thermal, thermal d dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone, cons dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml -> Wrong reports of spelling errors dptfxtract.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone, cons dptfxtract.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml -> Wrong reports of spelling errors dptfxtract.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/dptfxtract -> Upstream binary should not be modified This is my first rpmfusion package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 months, 1 week

1
28
0 / 0

[Bug 5163] New: Review request: olive - Professional open-source NLE video editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163 Bug ID: 5163 Summary: Review request: olive - Professional open-source NLE video editor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: mgansser(a)online.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/olive.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/olive-0-0.1.20190206gitfc9... Description:Olive is a free non-linear video editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg this package belongs to rpmfusion, due ffmpeg dependencies. $ rpmlint -i -v olive.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/olive-0-0.1.20190206gitfc96ad7.fc29.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/olive-0- 0.1.20190206gitfc96ad7.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/olive-debugsource-0-0.1.20190206gitfc96ad7.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/olive-debuginfo-0-0.1.20190206gitfc96ad7.fc29.x86_64.rpm olive.spec: I: checking olive.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/olive-editor/olive/archive/fc96ad7735c1120a9d5f4692e12... (timeout 10 seconds) olive.src: I: checking olive.src: I: checking-url https://www.olivevideoeditor.org (timeout 10 seconds) olive.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/olive-editor/olive/archive/fc96ad7735c1120a9d5f4692e12... (timeout 10 seconds) olive.x86_64: I: checking olive.x86_64: I: checking-url https://www.olivevideoeditor.org (timeout 10 seconds) olive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary olive-editor Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. olive-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking olive-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking-url https://www.olivevideoeditor.org (timeout 10 seconds) olive-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking olive-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url https://www.olivevideoeditor.org (timeout 10 seconds) 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. %changelog * Wed Feb 06 2019 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0-0.1.20190206gitfc96ad7 - initial package, not even released as version 0.1... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 months, 1 week

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 3863] New: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863 Bug #: 3863 Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data. . game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data). Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others. http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/ ------------- http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool... The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release, so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release. These are built this way: git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master > ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz Which makes rmplint complain: "game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz" ------------- This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's free software, but of no use without non-free assets; likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 : "game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself." --------------------------- remaining rpmlint: game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror lists. either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time, or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't much matter. http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager that's not a script intended to be run, but a script fragement to be sourced game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too ----- This is my first RPM Fusion package. ------- upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule; having this would allow to trim the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 months, 3 weeks

1
28
0 / 0

About multilibs support in RPM Fusion

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, For the info, I've restored the capability to build for multilibs on fedora 31+ (as we don't build i686 by default). There is a rfpkg update that is been prepared by sergio to automate the appropriate packages to be forwarded to the related koji build target. The current packages that will build on multilibs are currently limited to steam, libva-intel-driver and nvidia driver. If other components are missing, please let me know. For the long run, it's more complicated as i386 repos doesn't seem to be published (el8) or are going to be less reliable (fedora 31+). So instead, I envision to build using the x86_64 repos (using a x86_64 compiler and tools and i686 libraries). For information, RHEL8 is obviously building i686 with -m32 -march=x86_64 by default, so I assume the i686 packages are already built using a x86_64 userspace there. I've reported this issue to mock to investigate how this can be achieved: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/340 Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

1 year

4
6
0 / 0

[Bug 5367] New: Review request: fedy - Install codecs and additional software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5367 Bug ID: 5367 Summary: Review request: fedy - Install codecs and additional software Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/fedy-5.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/fedy.spec Summary: Install codecs and additional software Koji scratch build: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=350702 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 2 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 2929] New: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 Bug #: 2929 Summary: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cickumqt(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://cicku.me/smtube.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/smtube-1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: SMTube is a Youtube browser which allows to search, play and download Youtube videos. This project is based on some code from UMPlayer. Reason for not in Fedora: It needs smplayer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 5370] New: Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5370 Bug ID: 5370 Summary: Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/plex-media-player.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/plex-media-player-2.40.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Summary: Plex Media Player This package depends on mpv-devel , so it's made for the free section. Koji scratch build for f32-free: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=352309 (arm/arm64 build still on-going). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
10
0 / 0

Rawhide-nonfree: Can't find krb5-libs

by Richard Shaw

I thought maybe it was a transient error but 5 build attempts and still no luck: Error: Error downloading packages: Status code: 404 for http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everythi... Looks like -45 release has been built for Fedora... Bad repo data? Thanks, Richard

1 year, 6 months

3
4
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2019-09-29

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 29 ------------- Pushed to testing: mpd-0.21.15-1.fc29 telegram-desktop-1.8.9-1.fc29 Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-1.fc29 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-2.fc29 Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: mpd-0.21.15-1.fc30 ppsspp-1.9.0-1.fc30 telegram-desktop-1.8.9-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: kdenlive-19.04.3-1.fc30 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-1.fc30 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-2.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-libs-media-freeworld-77.0.3865.90-1.fc31 gstreamer1-libav-1.16.1-1.fc31 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.16.1-1.fc31 gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.16.1-1.fc31 mpd-0.21.15-1.fc31 ppsspp-1.9.0-1.fc31 rfpkg-1.26.2-1.fc31 telegram-desktop-1.8.9-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: chromium-vaapi-77.0.3865.90-1.fc31 ffmpegthumbs-19.08.1-1.fc31 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-1.fc31 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-2.fc31 rfpkg-1.26.1-1.fc31 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-2.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: rfpkg-1.26.2-1.el8 rfpkgdb-cli-2.15.0-0.3rc2.el8 Pushed to stable: HandBrake-1.2.2-6.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 29 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.1-1.fc29 Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-12.fc30 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.1-1.fc30 wl-kmod-6.30.223.271-29.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-12.fc31 mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.1-1.fc31 wl-kmod-6.30.223.271-29.fc31 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.1-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2019-09-26

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2019