https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster <alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net&gt; 2011-11-23 22:43:11 CET --- (In reply to comment #0) Have you already been sponsored in Fedora? If so, I don't think you need a separate RPM Fusion sponsor. If not, I'm not sure how it works if you aren't sponsored in Fedora and only maintain RPM Fusion packages. Looks good. I'll try to review, but can't promise when. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

Richard Shaw wrote: The reason it's not common is that Fedora does not automatically recognize RPM Fusion sponsorship the way RPM Fusion recognizes Fedora sponsorship, so you end up having to go through another sponsorship process at least formally to get sponsored in Fedora (whereas getting sponsored in RPM Fusion once you're sponsored in Fedora is just a matter of telling the admins "Hey, I'm already sponsored in Fedora and I want to maintain package XYZ in RPM Fusion, can you please mark my account as sponsored?"). Kevin Kofler

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #3 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2011-12-30 08:49:06 CET --- The package has been updated to reflect the latest upstream changes (see the changelog in the ".spec" file). Spec URL: http://db.tt/SstLJib4 SRPM URL: http://db.tt/Irmu0zWs Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec": 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.2.gitf5dcafd.fc16.src.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.2.gitf5dcafd.fc16.noarch.rpm": gnome-shell-extension-weather.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary weather-extension-configurator 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I am still seeking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #5 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2011-12-31 07:56:19 CET --- (In reply to comment #4) I've updated the .spec file according to your advice. Thank you. Spec URL: http://db.tt/GmHGGH3L SRPM URL: http://db.tt/x8xJFzHX (Here's also the link to the RPM package for Fedora 16, if someone wants to install and try the extension: http://db.tt/1Qrr0cQZ ) The outputs of rpmlint are the same as in comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #7 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2012-01-01 18:34:14 CET --- (In reply to comment #6) I had the same problem with the WOEID of my town. All I had to do was changing the WOEID to the one of a nearby bigger town. Anyway, the issue doesn't depend on the extension or on the package; there may be something wrong with Yahoo! Weather, which the data are fetched from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-01-01 19:13:21 CET --- Well I live in a medium sized town and I get weather with "USMS0365". Perhaps there's different types of WOEID's? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #11 from Andre Robatino <robatino(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-01-01 19:39:49 CET --- (In reply to comment #9) Yes, "USMS0365" works for me, and in fact, it turns out that US Zip codes work as well, so for Brookline, MA I can just use "02446". But when I googled for "WOEID Brookline", I was only finding the 7-digit decimal codes, and those don't work - and this is even in Yahoo's documentation, for example http://developer.yahoo.com/geo/geoplanet/guide/concepts.html It might be my ignorance - I never heard of WOEIDs before and just wanted to do a quick search for the correct value - but a lot of other people would be in the same position and maybe a pointer to a good lookup site would help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #13 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2012-01-02 08:35:37 CET --- I informed Simon Legner, the developer of the extension, about the WOEID issue: https://github.com/simon04/gnome-shell-extension-weather/issues/52 Maybe he can help us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #15 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2012-01-13 08:33:22 CET --- New version. Spec URL: http://db.tt/D4QZehyV SRPM URL: http://db.tt/B25ELmBs ( RPM package for Fedora 16: http://db.tt/N9Wubfdb ) The outputs of rpmlint are the same as in comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Christian METZLER <neroth(a)xeked.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neroth(a)xeked.com --- Comment #17 from Christian METZLER <neroth(a)xeked.com&gt; 2012-02-15 21:43:29 CET --- Try with my fork: https://github.com/Neroth/gnome-shell-extension-weather => No WOEID, Multi city and new setting panel. In future : Using various services like Google Weather API or World Weather Online... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #19 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2012-03-29 09:25:29 CEST --- A new version of the package. Spec URL: http://db.tt/hQ27NI6g SRPM URL: http://db.tt/B9FBP2RZ (RPM package for Fedora 16: http://db.tt/6EqUgCje ) Outputs of rpmlint: the same as in comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #21 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; 2012-03-31 09:24:28 CEST --- (In reply to comment #20) The fork by Neroth features some nice improvements, but the one by Simon04 is updated more often and is more complete. For the moment, I prefer to stick with the latter. And here's a new version. Spec URL: http://db.tt/o1yCyXeg SRPM URL: http://db.tt/MOluKP1S ( RPM package for Fedora 16: http://db.tt/nKn9xH2m ) Note #1: from now on, I'll report rpmlint outputs only if they differ from the ones in comment #3. Note #2: it seems this (and the previous) version has got an issue: forecasts aren't displayed in the popup if "Show Sunrise / Sunset times" is checked in the configuration window ( https://github.com/simon04/gnome-shell-extension-weather/issues/74 ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #23 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-04-03 01:22:50 CEST --- I can take care of the review part, but I can't sponsor you. Have you tried doing other informal reviews on Fedora or RPM Fusion? It would help you get the attention of a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #25 from Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-13 12:24:31 CEST --- IMPORTANT NEWS: Now I am a sponsored Fedora packager (please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 ). More, I switched to the fork developed by Neroth ( https://github.com/Neroth/gnome-shell-extension-weather ), which now seems to be ahead of the one by simon04 in terms of completeness and features. So, here you are the Spec and the SRPM files (plus an RPM package for Fedora 17) of gnome-shell-extension-weather by Neroth: Spec URL: http://db.tt/H9ybFOd0 SRPM URL: http://db.tt/WVtOSDLR (RPM package for Fedora 17: http://db.tt/agAOcAdE ) Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec ../RPMS/*/gnome-shell-extension-weather*.rpm ../SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-weather*.rpm": gnome-shell-extension-weather.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US informations -> information, information's, in formations gnome-shell-extension-weather.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US informations -> information, information's, in formations 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com |mfusion.org | --- Comment #27 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-14 00:53:40 CEST --- I'll take this since I'm using it already :) Don't forget to drop the NEEDSPONSORS blocker since you're sponsored now. Also, make sure you write on the mailing list since Nicolas (or whoever else can set you up) may not see it on the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|30 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #29 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-14 21:52:14 CEST --- Quick spec review: 1. Are you sure this requires Gnome 3.4? I've been running this extension on Fedora 16 with Gnome 3.1. 2. You need one blank line between your changelog entries for better legibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #31 from Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-16 09:21:56 CEST --- (In reply to comment #27) By the way, I wrote on the mailing list two days ago to tell that I am sponsored in Fedora now ( https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2012-May/01250... ), but nothing has happened yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #33 from Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-17 16:04:38 CEST --- Here's the latest version (with auto-completion of city names in the setting panel), with a Spec file corrected according to Richard's suggestions. Spec URL: http://db.tt/8byNiC37 SRPM URL: http://db.tt/8AO80DVx (RPM package for Fedora 17: http://db.tt/x8r5Gdph ) If you can, please try to compile and/or install it on Fedora 16 / GNOME 3.2 to confirm it works. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #35 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-18 17:47:44 CEST --- Hmm... F16 is still on gnome 3.1... I'll force it to build anyway and see what happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #37 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-19 21:26:02 CEST --- (In reply to comment #36) Well, it works fine as built, I'm running fully updated F16 but when I do this: $ rpm -qa | grep gnome-common gnome-common-3.1.0-1.fc16.noarch If I leave the 3.2 version requirement in the spec I can't build it. Works fine though. Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #39 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-22 22:28:16 CEST --- Also, since configure is nice enough to spit out it's minimum requirements, I added the following in my copy of the spec: BuildRequires: autoconf >= 2.53, automake >= 1.9, intltool >= 0.25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #41 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-30 04:24:03 CEST --- Last one looks good to me! +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: Question or clairification needed N: not applicable MUST: [+] rpmlint output: shown in comment. [+] follows package naming guidelines [+] spec file base name matches package name [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license: GPLv3+ [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license file is included in %doc: COPYING [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: recursive diff produces no output [+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested x86_64 [N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [N] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [+] no relocatable packages [+] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [N] header files in -devel [N] static libraries in -static [N] .so in -devel [N] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [+] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [+] query upstream for license text [N] description and summary contains available translations [+] package builds in mock [+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64 [+] package functions as described: Works for me! [+] sane scriptlets [N] subpackages require the main package [N] placement of pkgconfig files [+] file dependencies versus package dependencies [+] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux(a)gmail.com --- Comment #43 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-30 12:27:46 CEST --- Don't forget to apply for cvs and add 33 to the blocks on this report. http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Your_package_gets_approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #45 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-30 13:19:02 CEST --- (In reply to comment #44) That is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #48 from Mattia Meneguzzo <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-31 00:30:48 CEST --- The package has been imported into CVS and built with success. I'm closing this bug. Thank you all for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #49 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-08-19 12:29:13 CEST --- (In reply to comment #48) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:41:06 +0200 From: Mattia <hal8600(a)hotmail.it&gt; To: rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org Subject: gnome-shell-extension-weather: build failed Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2910CFB3F7EF0CFFC05574FD8BB0(a)phx.gbl&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I tried to build gnome-shell-extension-weather (branches: *devel*, *F-16*, * F-17*) on Plague, but all builds failed. Here are the logs: * http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/1421... * http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-16-rpmfusion_free/14213-gnome-s... * http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-17-rpmfusion_free/14214-gnome-s... *Mock* on my local machine built the package (for Fedora 17 x86_64) with success. The results of *mock* are inside this archive: http://db.tt/qTbAvgDm Any suggestions on what to do? Thank you. Regards, M.M.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #51 from Mattia M. <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-08-19 15:27:45 CEST --- Thank you. (In reply to comment #49) The %build section has been like that since the beginning. After the correction you has suggested, Plague has managed to build the package in the devel branch, but has failed again in the F-16 and F-17 branches. The error seems to be: (see build.log here: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-17-rpmfusion_free/14217-gnome-s... ) checking for automake >= 1.9... testing automake-1.11... not found. testing automake-1.10... not found. testing automake-1.9... not found. ***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.9 installed to build gnome-shell-extension-weather. Download the appropriate package for from your distribution or get the source tarball at http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.tar.gz And, again, mock on my local machine manages to build the package correctly (for Fedora 17 x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #53 from Mattia M. <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-08-19 15:39:34 CEST --- (In reply to comment #52) I think there's nothing wrong in our spec file: please, read here: https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2012-August/01... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #55 from Mattia M. <mattia.meneguzzo+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-08-19 15:51:54 CEST --- (In reply to comment #54) So, thanks for pointing that out. Any suggestion aiming to increase my (little) experience in packaging is welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.