[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

Switching from GCC to llvm-clang...

Re: Rawhide

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 29 March 2015 Sun, 29 Mar '15

3:18 p.m.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Bug #: 3576 Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software. I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in Fedora. OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think that all of these errors are related to this. rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

Show replies by thread

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 29 March Sun, 29 Mar

4:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgansser(a)alice.de --- Comment #1 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2015-03-29 18:42:57 CEST --- This is not a full review, bu a view things that should be changed. 1. Please use macro %cmake it already sets CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. Look at "rpm -E %cmake" to see what I mean. It would be odd if had to add these to get the proper behavior. 2. for better readability you should write a new line for each BR. BuildRequires: gcc-objc BuildRequires: cmake BuildRequires: libX11-devel .... 3. belongs to a devel-package: obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. 4. The incorrect FSF address needs to be reported upstream, don't change the license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

5:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #2 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-03-29 19:38:41 CEST --- I corrected issues in question and reported incorrect FSF address upstream: https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/405 Links are the same, but files are updated, I hope that that is fine: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 13 May Wed, 13 May

3:21 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #3 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-05-13 05:21:08 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.10.0 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.0-1/obs-studio-0.10.0-1.fc21.src... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.0-1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.10.0-1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:69: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:74: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.10.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.10.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.10.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Thursday, 14 May Thu, 14 May

7:04 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #4 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-05-14 09:04:13 CEST --- Tidying up %files and changelog and adding %package and %description for devel rpm Updated srpm and spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.0-2/obs-studio-0.10.0-2.fc21.src... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.0-2/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.10.0-2.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:83: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.10.0-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.10.0-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.10.0-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 19 May Tue, 19 May

2:03 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #5 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-05-19 04:03:30 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.10.1 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-1/obs-studio-0.10.1-1.fc21.src... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.10.1-1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:83: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.10.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.10.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.10.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 27 May Wed, 27 May

11:40 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #6 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-05-27 13:40:14 CEST --- Further diving into packaging indicates that all alpha software should have 0.* release tag. Rebuilt packages to honour this. Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:83: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 11 July Sat, 11 Jul

4:03 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #7 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-07-11 18:03:34 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.1 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.1-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.1-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.11.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 29 July Wed, 29 Jul

11:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #8 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-07-30 01:42:29 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.2 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.2-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.2-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.2-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint obs-studio-0.11.2-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.2-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.2-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Friday, 7 August Fri, 7 Aug

2:25 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #9 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2015-08-07 16:25:59 CEST --- obs-studio-0.11.2 is now available. please report both warning/error to upstream at https://obsproject.com/mantis/bug_report_page.php [martin@fc22 x86_64]$ rpmlint -i obs-studio-0.11.2-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux This package installs an ELF binary in the /usr/share hierarchy, which is reserved for architecture-independent files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

3:28 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #10 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-08-07 17:28:16 CEST --- Thank you Martin, both reported upstream! shared-lib-calls-exit: https://obsproject.com/mantis/view.php?id=272 arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share https://obsproject.com/mantis/view.php?id=273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 8 August Sat, 8 Aug

8:49 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #11 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-08-08 10:49:36 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.3 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.3-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.3-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.3-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.3-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.11.3-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.3-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.3-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 17 August Mon, 17 Aug

2:11 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #12 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-08-17 16:11:04 CEST --- I noticed that versioning was counting either on .git or OBS_OVERRIDE_VERSION to provide correct version (otherwise it was set to 0.0.1), so I used latter which is appropriate for packaging. Also, upstream released OBS-studio 0.11.4 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.11.4-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.11.4-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Thursday, 24 September Thu, 24 Sep

6:01 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #13 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-09-24 08:01:23 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.12.0 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.0-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.0-0.1.fc21... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.0-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.0-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.0-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.0-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.0-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Friday, 20 November Fri, 20 Nov

8:08 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #14 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-11-20 21:08:30 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.12.1 Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.1-0.1.fc22... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.1-0.1.fc22.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.1-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.1-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.1-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 22 November Sun, 22 Nov

2:07 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #15 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-11-22 15:07:38 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.12.2 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.2-0.1.fc22... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.2-0.1.fc22... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.2-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.2-0.1.fc22.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.2-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.2-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.2-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 5 December Sat, 5 Dec

1:20 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #16 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-12-05 14:20:27 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.12.3 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.3-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.3-0.1.fc22... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.3-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.3-0.1.fc22... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.3-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.3-0.1.fc22.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.3-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.3-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.3-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 12 December Sat, 12 Dec

11:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #17 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-12-13 00:37:45 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.12.4 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.1.fc22... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.1.fc22... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.1.fc22.src.rpm obs-studio.src:56: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:79: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.4-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.4-0.1.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 21 December Mon, 21 Dec

6:27 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #18 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-12-21 19:27:43 CET --- Thanks Martin for fixing multilib. Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.2/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.2.fc22... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.2/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.2.fc22... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.12.4-0.2/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.2.fc22.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.12.4-0.2.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.12.4-0.2.fc22.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.12.4-0.2.fc22.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 7 February Sun, 7 Feb

3:07 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #19 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-02-07 16:07:59 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.13.1 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.1-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.1-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.13.1-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.13.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.13.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.13.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 23 February Tue, 23 Feb

6:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #20 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-02-23 07:50:18 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.13.2 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.2-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.2-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.2-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.13.2-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.13.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.13.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.13.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 20 March Sun, 20 Mar

9:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #21 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-03-20 10:50:00 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.13.3 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.3-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.3-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.3-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.3-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.3-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.13.3-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.13.3-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.13.3-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.13.3-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 22 March Tue, 22 Mar

7:49 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #22 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-03-22 20:49:36 CET --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.13.4 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.4-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.4-0.1/obs-studio-0.13.4-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.13.4-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.13.4-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.13.4-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.13.4-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.13.4-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 24 April Sun, 24 Apr

9:46 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #23 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-04-24 23:46:52 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.14.0 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.0-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.0-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.0-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.0-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.0-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.14.0-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.14.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.14.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.14.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 25 April Mon, 25 Apr

6:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #24 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-04-25 20:21:38 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.14.1 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.1-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.1-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.14.1-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.14.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.14.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.14.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 16 May Mon, 16 May

6:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #25 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-05-16 20:37:17 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.14.2 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.2-0.1.fc23... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.2-0.1/obs-studio-0.14.2-0.1.fc23... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.14.2-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.14.2-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.14.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.14.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.14.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 9 July Sat, 9 Jul

6:26 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #26 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-09 20:26:07 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.15.0 My fedorapeople page was getting ridiculous so I grouped all packages in one folder. That brakes older links, but the files are still there under Packages/obs-studio. Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.0-0.1/obs-st... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.0-0.1/obs-st... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.0-0.1/obs-st... rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.0-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.0-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 10 July Sun, 10 Jul

3:51 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sergio(a)serjux.com --- Comment #27 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-10 05:51:22 CEST --- Momcilo Medic what is your fas username ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

10:43 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #28 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-10 12:43:13 CEST --- Hi Sergio, My fas username is 'fedorauser'. Kind regards, Momcilo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

5:51 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #29 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-10 19:51:38 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.15.1 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.1-0.1/obs-st... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.1-0.1/obs-st... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.1-0.1/obs-st... rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.1-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.1-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 11 July Mon, 11 Jul

4:11 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #30 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-07-11 18:11:47 CEST --- (In reply to comment #28)

...

Hi Sergio, My fas username is 'fedorauser'. Kind regards, Momcilo.

I guess is fas username in Fedora, but you need a fas username in rpmfusion : https://fas.rpmfusion.org/ (you may/should use same username) also please confirm security exception for ssl certificate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Tuesday, 12 July Tue, 12 Jul

6:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #31 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-12 20:19:19 CEST --- Hi Sergio, Yes, that was my Fedora Project fas username. I've created fas for RPMFusion as well. It is also 'fedorauser'. CLA done. Kind regards, Momcilo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 16 July Sat, 16 Jul

8:13 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #32 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-16 22:13:29 CEST --- Upstream released OBS-studio 0.15.2 Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.1/obs-st... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.1/obs-st... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.1/obs-st... rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.2-0.1.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.2-0.1.fc23.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 20 July Wed, 20 Jul

8:34 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #33 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-07-20 22:34:01 CEST --- Updated package with Martin's changes. Thanks Martin! Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.3/obs-st... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.3/obs-st... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.2-0.3/obs-st... rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.2-0.3.fc24.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.2-0.3.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-libs-0.15.2-0.3.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.2-0.3.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.2-0.3.fc24.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Sunday, 24 July Sun, 24 Jul

8:32 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #34 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2016-07-24 10:32:33 CEST --- please don't forget to post the %changelog when something has changed. %changelog * Wed Jul 20 2016 Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.3 - Added license file gplv2.txt * Mon Jul 18 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.2 - Fixed arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share - Added obs-ffmpeg-mux.patch - Added libs subpkg - Call ldconfig in post(un) scripts for the shared library Now I think the important pieces of the review request are in place. Obviously, you now need a sponsor. Please look into [1] on how to achieve this. This is written for fedora packages, but the basic task is the same in rpmfusion: you need to show that you understand the Packaging Guidelines. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 3 August Wed, 3 Aug

10:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #35 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> 2016-08-04 00:16:27 CEST --- Created attachment 1596 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1596 spec file patch I have attached a patch with some recommended changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Thursday, 4 August Thu, 4 Aug

3:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #36 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-08-04 17:37:57 CEST --- (In reply to comment #34)

...

please don't forget to post the %changelog when something has changed. %changelog * Wed Jul 20 2016 Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.3 - Added license file gplv2.txt * Mon Jul 18 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.2 - Fixed arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share - Added obs-ffmpeg-mux.patch - Added libs subpkg - Call ldconfig in post(un) scripts for the shared library Now I think the important pieces of the review request are in place.

MartinKG , do you approve this package ? just after the package be approved , we can sponsor Momcilo (I guess), I may sponsor him, I share the trust of sponsor with your revision, I think is that way, the logic first approve after sponsor.

...

Obviously, you now need a sponsor. Please look into [1] on how to achieve this. This is written for fedora packages, but the basic task is the same in rpmfusion: you need to show that you understand the Packaging Guidelines. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

4:06 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|2 |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |mgansser(a)alice.de |mfusion.org | --- Comment #37 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2016-08-04 18:06:47 CEST --- (In reply to comment #36)

...

(In reply to comment #34) > please don't forget to post the %changelog when something has changed. > > %changelog > * Wed Jul 20 2016 Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.3 > - Added license file gplv2.txt > > * Mon Jul 18 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.2 > - Fixed arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > - Added obs-ffmpeg-mux.patch > - Added libs subpkg > - Call ldconfig in post(un) scripts for the shared library > > Now I think the important pieces of the review request are in place. MartinKG , do you approve this package ? just after the package be approved , we can sponsor Momcilo (I guess), I may sponsor him, I share the trust of sponsor with your revision, I think is that way, the logic first approve after sponsor.

I will approve this package, but he should applying the patch from Leight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

4:07 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

6:07 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-08-04 20:07:26 CEST --- (In reply to comment #37)

...

> > MartinKG , do you approve this package ? just after the package be approved , > we can sponsor Momcilo (I guess), I may sponsor him, I share the trust of > sponsor with your revision, I think is that way, the logic first approve after > sponsor. I will approve this package, but he should applying the patch from Leight.

'Momcilo Medic' has been sponsored! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7:14 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|30 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Monday, 8 August Mon, 8 Aug

8:30 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #39 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-08-08 22:30:25 CEST --- Hey Leigh, Thank you for your patch, I've applied all pieces but the release numbering. Reason why I went with the 0.x release is because software is considered beta. Guidelines[1] recommend using 0.x convention, and git snapshots should have commits. Please do share your thoughts on this matter as I am unexperienced. I am posting another release here until we agree on the release tag. Thanks ;) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidel... %changelog * Mon Aug 08 2016 Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.4-0.1 - Updated to 0.15.4 * Fri Aug 05 2016 Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.15.2-0.5 - Added alsa-devel as BR for ALSA plugin. - Added vlc-devel as BR for VLC plugin. - Added systemd-devel as BR for Udev V4L. * Wed Aug 03 2016 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 0.15.2-0.4 - Fix source tag (spectool now downloads in n-v format) - Remove surplus ldconfig from postun (no public .so files in main package) - Update scriptlets to meet guidelines (need full path) Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-0.1/obs-st... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-0.1/obs-st... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-0.1/obs-st... rplint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.4-0.1.fc24.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.4-0.1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-libs-0.15.4-0.1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.4-0.1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.4-0.1.fc24.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Wednesday, 10 August Wed, 10 Aug

9:24 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #40 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2016-08-10 11:24:23 CEST --- Hi Momcilo, please take the patch from Leigh, because it's not a git or post release version, and change the release tag from 0.1 to 1 +- Fix release tag (0.x release is for git releases) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Friday, 12 August Fri, 12 Aug

6:22 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #41 from Momcilo Medic <fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org> 2016-08-12 08:22:59 CEST --- Hi Martin, I've done as you told me. Regards. %changelog * Fri Aug 12 2016 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 0.15.4-1 - Fix release tag (0.x release is for git releases) Installation RPM: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-1/obs-stud... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-1/obs-stud... Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-1/obs-stud... https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/obs-studio/0.15.4-1/obs-stud... rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.15.4-1.fc24.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.15.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-libs-0.15.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.15.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.15.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

9:39 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #42 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2016-08-12 11:39:35 CEST --- please go a head what is described in Section 3.5 on http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Your_package_gets_approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2:13 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #43 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-08-12 16:13:43 CEST --- (In reply to comment #42)

...

please go a head what is described in Section 3.5 on http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Your_package_gets_approved

MartinKG you should wrote "package approved" :) Momcilo Medic the package is approved you need make an cvs request and block #33 you may get inspiration on https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4159#c7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

Saturday, 13 August Sat, 13 Aug

10:39 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |33 --- Comment #44 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2016-08-13 12:39:26 CEST --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: obs-studio Short Description: Open Broadcaster Software Studio Owners: fedorauser Branches: f23 f24 f25 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

10:40 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|33 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

10:43 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 --- Comment #45 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2016-08-13 12:43:06 CEST --- I have made the cvs request myself because I won't be able to process it next week. So the git module is done, please import your approved package. Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux(a)gmail.com --- Comment #46 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> 2016-08-13 21:00:05 CEST --- @MartinKG It was too painful watching you importing each branch separately, this really screws up merges from master. Also using clog isn't needed, it's easier using 'git commit -a -m 'commit message' I also disabled arm build as it doesn't have the SSE stuff required to compile. https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/obs-studio.git/commit/?h=f25&id=... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

10:10 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 3576] Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1869

days inactive

3316

days old

rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org

Manage subscription

51 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

RPM Fusion Bugzilla

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio